Iowa Code » Chapter 321B — MOTOR VEHICLE GLASS REPAIR, REPLACEMENT, AND INSURANCE
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 321B.8 (2026)

Penalty

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A person who violates a provision of this chapter commits an unfair trade practice under chapter 507B. 2025 Acts, ch 58, §8, 10 Section applies to insurance policies issued or renewed on or after July 1, 2025; 2025 Acts, ch 58, §10 NEW section\n\nTue Dec 09 22:16:05 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 321B (20, 4)

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases, 1967–2019 · leading case: Taylor v. Dep't of Transp., 260 N.W.2d 521 (Iowa 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Taylor v. Dep't of Transp., 260 N.W.2d 521 (Iowa 1977). · cites it 6× “Taylor contends here as he did at the administrative hearing and in the trial court that the department of transportation lost jurisdiction by failing to provide him a hearing within 20 days of receipt of his request for hearing as required by § 321B.8, The Code, and that he…”
McFee v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 400 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa 1987). · cites it 6× “2d 521 (Iowa 1977), was Iowa Code section 321B.8, which in relevant part provided: “Upon the written request of a person whose privilege to drive has been revoked or denied, the [Department] shall grant the person an opportunity to be heard within twenty days after the receipt…”
McCrea v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 336 N.W.2d 427 (Iowa 1983). · cites it 4× “Iowa Code § 321B.8. At the administrative hearing, Iowa Code § 17A.”
State v. Charlson, 154 N.W.2d 829 (Iowa 1967). · cites it 4× “Section 321B.8 authorizes an administrative hearing upon such revocation and 321B.”
Heidemann v. Sweitzer, 375 N.W.2d 665 (Iowa 1985). · cites it 2× “Heidemann requested and received a hearing on the revocation of his license, pursuant to Iowa Code section 321B.8 (1981), but that contested case evi-dentiary hearing was not held until May 20, 1982.”
Iowa Supreme Court Disciplinary Bd., Appellee, v. Attorney Doe No. 819, Appellant, 894 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2016). · cites it 2× “In Taylor , an appellant charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence contended that because the department of transportation failed to provide him a hearing within twenty days as required by Iowa Code section 321B.”
Severson v. Sueppel, 152 N.W.2d 281 (Iowa 1967). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff then requested á hearing to review the revocation order as *1173 provided for by section 321B.8. Following hearing before defendant’s authorized agent the revocation was sustained.”
Janson v. Fulton, 162 N.W.2d 438 (Iowa 1968). · cites it 2× “The commissioner’s revocation, based upon a sworn report of highway patrolman Le-Moine, had been sustained at a hearing requested by Janson under the provisions of Code section 321B.8. Janson then appealed to the district court under the provisions of section 321B.”
Buda v. Fulton, 157 N.W.2d 336 (Iowa 1968). · cites it 2× “(Code section 321B.8.) The previously issued order of revocation was sustained.”
Renewable Fuels, Inc. v. Iowa Ins. Comm'r, 752 N.W.2d 441 (Iowa Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “In Taylor , Floyd Taylor sought a dismissal of a license revocation proceeding because the department failed to provide him with a hearing within the statutory time period set forth in Iowa Code section 321B.8. 260 N.W.2d at 522 . Taylor argued the department “lost jurisdiction”…”
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Bd. v. Attorney Doe No. 819, 888 N.W.2d 248 (Iowa 2016). · cites it 2× “In Taylor , an appellant charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence contended that because the department of transportation failed to provide him a hearing within twenty days as required by Iowa Code section 321B.”
Foley v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Veh. Div., 362 N.W.2d 208 (Iowa 1985). · cites it 2× “The 45-day revocation was the result of a bargain Foley made with a department of transportation hearing officer in which Foley waived his right to a formal hearing under section 321B.8 (1979) in exchange for a shorter revocation period than that provided in section 321B.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.