Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 322A.4 (2026)

Additional franchise

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No franchiser shall enter into any franchise for the purpose of establishing an additional motor vehicle dealership in any community in which the same line-make is then represented, unless the franchiser has first established in a hearing held under the provisions of this chapter that there is good cause for such additional motor vehicle dealership under such franchise, and that it is in the public interest. [C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §322A.4]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2022 · leading case: New Motor Veh. Bd. of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 439 U.S. 96 (1978).
New Motor Veh. Bd. of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 439 U.S. 96 (1978). · cites it 10× “§§ 437-28 (a), (b) (22) (1976); Iowa Code § 322A.4 (1977); Mass. Gen. Laws Ann.”
New Motor Veh. Bd. of California v. Orrin W. Fox Co. Et Al., 434 U.S. 1345 (1978). “1975); Iowa Code § 322A.4 (Supp. 1977-1978); Mass.”
Tober Foreign Motors, Inc. v. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc., 381 N.E.2d 908 (Mass. 1978). “§ 437-28 (b)(22)(B) (1976); Iowa Code Ann. § 322A.4 (Supp. 1978); Neb.”
Monmouth Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 509 A.2d 161 (N.J. 1986). “1985); Iowa Code § 322A.4 (1985); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 60-1422 (1974); Nev.”
Sioux City Truck Sales, Inc. v. Iowa Dep't of Transp. & Peterbilt Motors Co., & Allstate Peterbilt of Clear Lake (Iowa 2022). · cites it 25× “See Iowa Code §§ 322A.4, .16. The ALJ further found that good cause was not affected by SCTS’s later-expressed willingness to add a parts-and-service dealership because Peterbilt had a legitimate business concern that SCTS’s willingness was only nominal in nature.”
Sioux City Truck Sales, Inc. v. Iowa Dep't of Transp. (Iowa Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 17× “See Iowa Code § 322A.4. SCTS has owned and operated five Peterbilt dealerships in Iowa and Nebraska since 2013.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.