Iowa Code » Chapter 380 — CITY LEGISLATION
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 380.3 (2026)

Two considerations before final passage — how waived

✓ Iowa Code 2026 (laws through the 2025 session)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A proposed ordinance or amendment must be considered and voted on for passage at two council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed, unless this requirement is suspended by a recorded vote of not less than three-fourths of all of the members of the council. If a proposed ordinance, amendment, or resolution fails to receive sufficient votes for passage at any consideration and vote thereon, the proposed ordinance, amendment, or resolution shall be considered defeated. [R60, §1122; C73, §489; C97, §682; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §5716; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, §366.3; C75, 77, 79, 81, §380.3] 88 Acts, ch 1246, §5; 97 Acts, ch 168, §3, 4 Referred to in §321P.2

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1978–2014 · leading case: Kane v. City Council of the City of Cedar Rapids, 537 N.W.2d 718 (Iowa 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kane v. City Council of the City of Cedar Rapids, 537 N.W.2d 718 (Iowa 1995). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code §§ 380.3 , 414.3, .4. The reclassification of the Yaw property in 1979 from single-family *722 to multiple-family residence district was accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance.”
City of Hiawatha v. Reg'l Plan. Comm'n, 267 N.W.2d 31 (Iowa 1978). “§§ 380.3, 380.4, The Code. In accordance with these authorities, we hold § 473A.”
Rickie Allen Suiter & Darlene Marie Suiter v. the City Council of the City of Princeton, Iowa, No. 3-1122 / 13-0775 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb. 5, 2014). · cites it 2× “1” by failing “to first publish notice of a public hearing and to hold a public hearing on the proposed reclassification of the 8 permitted use before adopting Resolution 2012-20,” (2) the City “acted illegally when it failed to follow the procedures required for passage of an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.