Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 403.5 (2026)

Urban renewal plan

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. A municipality shall not approve an urban renewal project for an urban renewal area unless the governing body has, by resolution, determined the area to be a slum area, blighted area, economic development area or a combination of those areas, and designated the area as appropriate for an urban renewal project. The local governing body shall not approve an urban renewal plan until a general plan for the municipality has been prepared. For this purpose and other municipal purposes, authority is vested in every municipality to prepare, to adopt and to revise from time to time, a general plan for the physical development of the municipality as a whole, giving due regard to the environs and metropolitan surroundings.\n\nTue Dec 09 22:13:06 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 403 (54, 1) 3 URBAN RENEWAL, §403.5\n\nA municipality shall not acquire real property for an urban renewal project unless the local governing body has approved the urban renewal project in accordance with subsection 4.

2. a. The municipality may itself prepare or cause to be prepared an urban renewal plan; or any person or agency, public or private, may submit such a plan to a municipality. Prior to its approval of an urban renewal plan, the local governing body shall submit such plan to the planning commission of the municipality, if any, for review and recommendations as to its conformity with the general plan for the development of the municipality as a whole. The planning commission shall submit its written recommendations with respect to the proposed urban renewal plan to the local governing body within thirty days after receipt of the plan for review. Upon receipt of the recommendations of the planning commission or, if no recommendations are received within the thirty days, then, without such recommendations, the local governing body may proceed with the hearing on the proposed urban renewal plan prescribed by subsection 3.

b. (1) Prior to its approval of an urban renewal plan which provides for a division of revenue pursuant to section 403.19, the municipality shall mail the proposed plan by regular mail to the affected taxing entities. The municipality shall include with the proposed plan notification of a consultation to be held between the municipality and affected taxing entities prior to the public hearing on the urban renewal plan. If the proposed urban renewal plan or proposed urban renewal project within the urban renewal area includes the use of taxes resulting from a division of revenue under section 403.19 for a public building, including but not limited to a police station, fire station, administration building, swimming pool, hospital, library, recreational building, city hall, or other public building that is exempt from taxation, including the grounds of, and the erection, equipment, remodeling, or reconstruction of, and additions or extensions to, such a building, the municipality shall include with the proposed plan notification an analysis of alternative development options and funding for the urban renewal area or urban renewal project and the reasons such options would be less feasible than the proposed urban renewal plan or proposed urban renewal project. A copy of the analysis required in this subparagraph shall be included with the urban renewal report required under section 331.403 or 384.22, as applicable, and filed by December 1 following adoption of the urban renewal plan or project.

(2) Each affected taxing entity may appoint a representative to attend the consultation. The consultation may include a discussion of the estimated growth in valuation of taxable property included in the proposed urban renewal area, the fiscal impact of the division of revenue on the affected taxing entities, the estimated impact on the provision of services by each of the affected taxing entities in the proposed urban renewal area, and the duration of any bond issuance included in the plan. The designated representative of the affected taxing entity may make written recommendations for modification to the proposed division of revenue no later than seven days following the date of the consultation. The representative of the municipality shall, no later than seven days prior to the public hearing on the urban renewal plan, submit a written response to the affected taxing entity addressing the recommendations for modification to the proposed division of revenue.

3. The local governing body shall hold a public hearing on an urban renewal plan after public notice thereof by publication in a newspaper having a general circulation in the area of operation of the municipality. The notice shall describe the time, date, place and purpose of the hearing, shall generally identify the urban renewal area covered by the plan, and shall outline the general scope of the urban renewal activities under consideration. A copy of the notice shall be sent by ordinary mail to each affected taxing entity.

4. Following such hearing, the local governing body may approve an urban renewal plan if it finds that:

a. A feasible method exists for the location of families who will be displaced from the urban renewal area into decent, safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations within their means and without undue hardship to such families.

b. (1) The urban renewal plan conforms to the general plan of the municipality as a whole; provided, that if the urban renewal area consists of an area of open land to be acquired by the municipality, such area shall not be so acquired except:

(a) If it is to be developed for residential uses, the local governing body shall determine \n Tue Dec 09 22:13:06 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 403 (54, 1) §403.5, URBAN RENEWAL 4\n\nthat a shortage of housing of sound standards and design with decency, safety, and sanitation exists in the municipality; that the acquisition of the area for residential uses is an integral part of and essential to the program of the municipality; and that one or more of the following conditions exist:

(i) That the need for housing accommodations has been or will be increased as a result of the clearance of slums in other areas, including other portions of the urban renewal area.

(ii) That conditions of blight in the municipality and the shortage of decent, safe, and sanitary housing cause or contribute to an increase in and spread of disease and crime, so as to constitute a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare.

(iii) That the provision of public improvements related to housing and residential development will encourage housing and residential development which is necessary to encourage the retention or relocation of industrial and commercial enterprises in this state and its municipalities. (iv) The acquisition of the area is necessary to provide for the construction of housing for low and moderate income families.

(b) If it is to be developed for nonresidential uses, the local governing body shall determine that such nonresidential uses are necessary and appropriate to facilitate the proper growth and development of the community in accordance with sound planning standards and local community objectives.

(2) The acquisition of open land authorized in subparagraph (1), subparagraph divisions (a) and (b) may require the exercise of governmental action, as provided in this chapter, because of defective or unusual conditions of title, diversity of ownership, tax delinquency, improper subdivisions, outmoded street patterns, deterioration of site, economic disuse, unsuitable topography or faulty lot layouts, or because of the need for the correlation of the area with other areas of a municipality by streets and modern traffic requirements, or any combination of such factors or other conditions which retard development of the area. If such governmental action involves the exercise of eminent domain authority, the municipality is subject to the limitations of this chapter and chapters 6A and 6B.

5. a. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an urban renewal plan may be modified at any time. However, if the urban renewal plan is modified after the lease or sale by the municipality of real property in the urban renewal project area, such modification may be conditioned upon such approval of the owner, lessee, or successor in interest as the municipality may deem advisable, and in any event such modification shall be subject to such rights at law or in equity as a lessee or purchaser, or a lessee’s or purchaser’s successor or successors in interest, may be entitled to assert.

b. A municipality shall not approve an urban renewal project for an urban renewal area unless the governing body has amended or modified the adopted urban renewal plan to include the urban renewal project.

c. The municipality shall comply with the notification, consultation, and hearing process provided in this section prior to the approval of any amendment or modification to an adopted urban renewal plan if such amendment or modification provides for refunding bonds or refinancing resulting in an increase in debt service or provides for the issuance of bonds or other indebtedness, to be funded primarily in the manner provided in section 403.19, or if such amendment or modification provides for the inclusion and approval of an urban renewal project under paragraph “b”. However, the review and recommendation process conducted by the municipality’s planning commission under subsection 2, paragraph “a”, shall not be required when amending or modifying an adopted urban renewal plan.

d. Once determined to be a blighted area, a slum area, or an economic development area by a municipality, an urban renewal area shall not be redetermined by the municipality throughout the duration of the urban renewal area.

6. Upon the approval by a municipality of an urban renewal plan or of any modification thereof, such plan or modification shall be deemed to be in full force and effect for the respective urban renewal area, and the municipality may then cause such plan or modification to be carried out in accordance with its terms.

7. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, where the local governing body certifies that an area is in need of redevelopment or rehabilitation as a result of a flood, fire, \n Tue Dec 09 22:13:06 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 403 (54, 1) 5 URBAN RENEWAL, §403.6\n\nhurricane, earthquake, storm, or other catastrophe respecting which the governor of the state has certified the need for disaster assistance under Pub. L. No. 81-875, Eighty-first Congress, 64 Stat. 1109, codified at 42 U.S.C. §1855 – 1855g or other federal law, the local governing body may approve an urban renewal plan and an urban renewal project with respect to such area without regard to the provisions of subsection 4 and without regard to provisions of this section requiring notification and consultation, a general plan for the municipality, and a public hearing on the urban renewal plan or project. [C58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §403.5] 85 Acts, ch 66, §3; 94 Acts, ch 1182, §6; 96 Acts, ch 1204, §14 – 16; 99 Acts, ch 171, §35, 41, 42; 2006 Acts, ch 1010, §97; 2006 Acts, 1st Ex, ch 1001, §35, 36, 49; 2010 Acts, ch 1061, §157, 180; 2012 Acts, ch 1124, §13, 14 Referred to in §403.14, 403.17 \n

Notes of Decisions
Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, 878 N.W.2d 252 (Iowa 2016). · cites it 12× “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
Fults v. City of Coralville, 666 N.W.2d 548 (Iowa 2003). · cites it 9× “Iowa Code § 403.5 (6). Property owners do not contend the city is prohibited from consolidating urban renewal areas, especially those areas that are not contiguous.”
Dilley v. City of Des Moines, 247 N.W.2d 187 (Iowa 1976). · cites it 5× “al assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land, defective or unusual conditions of title, or the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such factors, substantially impairs or arrests the sound…”
Knudson v. City of Decorah, 622 N.W.2d 42 (Iowa 2000). · cites it 5× “Iowa Code § 403.5 (1) (emphasis added). Before a municipality may issue bonds to pay the costs of carrying out the purposes and provisions of chapter 403, it must authorize such action by resolution or ordinance.”
McMurray v. City Council of West Des Moines, 642 N.W.2d 273 (Iowa 2002). · cites it 4× “§ 403.5(1). Then, the governing body must hold a public hearing on the plan after appropriate notice.”
Webster Realty Co. v. City of Fort Dodge, 174 N.W.2d 413 (Iowa 1970). · cites it 6× “” Section 403.5(1) contains a related restrictive clause forbidding the approval of an urban renewal project “unless the governing body has, by resolution, determined such [urban renewal] area to be a slum area or a blighted area or a combination thereof, and designated such…”
Richards v. City of Muscatine, 237 N.W.2d 48 (Iowa 1975). · cites it 3× “Section 403.5(3), with which Muscatine complied, does state, “The local governing body shall hold a public hearing on an urban renewal project after public notice thereof by publication .”
Sergeant Bluff-Luton Sch. Dist. v. City of Sioux City, 562 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1997). · cites it 2× “The defendant (hereinafter “city”) is a municipality that adopted an urban renewal plan -under chapter 403 of the Code of Iowa (1993) , 1 On or about December 19, 1994, the city annexed the Virginia Meadows addition and amended its urban renewal project to include the Virginia…”
Boss Hotels Co. v. City of Des Moines, 141 N.W.2d 541 (Iowa 1966). · cites it 2× “The Urban Renewal Plan provides the council could make minor modifications and section 403.5(5), Code, 1962, provides, “5.”
Simpson v. Low-Rent Hous. Agency of Mount Ayr, 224 N.W.2d 624 (Iowa 1974). “Illustratively, Code § 403.5(1) says: “A municipality shall not approve an urban renewal project for an urban renewal area unless the governing body has, by resolution, determined such area to be a slum area or a blighted area or a combination thereof * * *.”
Amended June 24, 2016 Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa (Iowa 2016). · cites it 12× “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
Al Brueggeman, Dan Breuker, Tom Bremer, Roger Bosma, Mark Dillehay, Randy Rowe, Allen Rowe, & Jarrod Wallace v. Osceola Cnty., Iowa & the City of Harris, Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 5× “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
— Iowa Code § 403.5(1) — 5 cases
McMurray v. City Council of West Des Moines, 642 N.W.2d 273 (Iowa 2002). “§ 403.5(1). Then, the governing body must hold a public hearing on the plan after appropriate notice.”
Dilley v. City of Des Moines, 247 N.W.2d 187 (Iowa 1976). “al assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land, defective or unusual conditions of title, or the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such factors, substantially impairs or arrests the sound…”
Webster Realty Co. v. City of Fort Dodge, 174 N.W.2d 413 (Iowa 1970). “” Section 403.5(1) contains a related restrictive clause forbidding the approval of an urban renewal project “unless the governing body has, by resolution, determined such [urban renewal] area to be a slum area or a blighted area or a combination thereof, and designated such…”
Simpson v. Low-Rent Hous. Agency of Mount Ayr, 224 N.W.2d 624 (Iowa 1974). “Illustratively, Code § 403.5(1) says: “A municipality shall not approve an urban renewal project for an urban renewal area unless the governing body has, by resolution, determined such area to be a slum area or a blighted area or a combination thereof * * *.”
— Iowa Code § 403.5(2) — 2 cases
Fults v. City of Coralville, 666 N.W.2d 548 (Iowa 2003). “Iowa Code § 403.5 (6). Property owners do not contend the city is prohibited from consolidating urban renewal areas, especially those areas that are not contiguous.”
McMurray v. City Council of West Des Moines, 642 N.W.2d 273 (Iowa 2002). “§ 403.5(1). Then, the governing body must hold a public hearing on the plan after appropriate notice.”
— Iowa Code § 403.5(2)(a) — 3 cases
Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, 878 N.W.2d 252 (Iowa 2016). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
Al Brueggeman, Dan Breuker, Tom Bremer, Roger Bosma, Mark Dillehay, Randy Rowe, Allen Rowe, & Jarrod Wallace v. Osceola Cnty., Iowa & the City of Harris, Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2017). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
Amended June 24, 2016 Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa (Iowa 2016). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
— Iowa Code § 403.5(3) — 8 cases
Richards v. City of Muscatine, 237 N.W.2d 48 (Iowa 1975). “Section 403.5(3), with which Muscatine complied, does state, “The local governing body shall hold a public hearing on an urban renewal project after public notice thereof by publication .”
Webster Realty Co. v. City of Fort Dodge, 174 N.W.2d 413 (Iowa 1970). “” Section 403.5(1) contains a related restrictive clause forbidding the approval of an urban renewal project “unless the governing body has, by resolution, determined such [urban renewal] area to be a slum area or a blighted area or a combination thereof, and designated such…”
Fults v. City of Coralville, 666 N.W.2d 548 (Iowa 2003). “Iowa Code § 403.5 (6). Property owners do not contend the city is prohibited from consolidating urban renewal areas, especially those areas that are not contiguous.”
Sergeant Bluff-Luton Sch. Dist. v. City of Sioux City, 562 N.W.2d 154 (Iowa 1997). “The defendant (hereinafter “city”) is a municipality that adopted an urban renewal plan -under chapter 403 of the Code of Iowa (1993) , 1 On or about December 19, 1994, the city annexed the Virginia Meadows addition and amended its urban renewal project to include the Virginia…”
Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, 878 N.W.2d 252 (Iowa 2016). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
— Iowa Code § 403.5(4) — 3 cases
Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, 878 N.W.2d 252 (Iowa 2016). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
Al Brueggeman, Dan Breuker, Tom Bremer, Roger Bosma, Mark Dillehay, Randy Rowe, Allen Rowe, & Jarrod Wallace v. Osceola Cnty., Iowa & the City of Harris, Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2017). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
Amended June 24, 2016 Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa (Iowa 2016). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
— Iowa Code § 403.5(4)(6)(1) — 1 case
Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, 878 N.W.2d 252 (Iowa 2016). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
— Iowa Code § 403.5(4)(b) — 1 case
Knudson v. City of Decorah, 622 N.W.2d 42 (Iowa 2000). “Iowa Code § 403.5 (1) (emphasis added). Before a municipality may issue bonds to pay the costs of carrying out the purposes and provisions of chapter 403, it must authorize such action by resolution or ordinance.”
— Iowa Code § 403.5(4)(b)(1) — 1 case
Amended June 24, 2016 Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa (Iowa 2016). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
— Iowa Code § 403.5(5) — 3 cases
Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, 878 N.W.2d 252 (Iowa 2016). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
Boss Hotels Co. v. City of Des Moines, 141 N.W.2d 541 (Iowa 1966). “The Urban Renewal Plan provides the council could make minor modifications and section 403.5(5), Code, 1962, provides, “5.”
Amended June 24, 2016 Concerned Citizens of Se. Polk Sch. Dist. v. City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa, & the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, Iowa (Iowa 2016). “” Iowa Code §§ 403.5 (1), .17(23) (2013). This area, having been designated as appropriate for a renewal project, is known as an urban renewal area (URA).”
— Iowa Code § 403.5(6) — 2 cases
Fults v. City of Coralville, 666 N.W.2d 548 (Iowa 2003). “Iowa Code § 403.5 (6). Property owners do not contend the city is prohibited from consolidating urban renewal areas, especially those areas that are not contiguous.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.