Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 422.22 (2026)

Supplementary returns

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the director shall be of the opinion that any taxpayer required under this subchapter to file a return has failed to file such a return or to include in a return filed, either intentionally or through error, items of taxable income, the director may require from such taxpayer a return or supplementary return in such form as the director shall prescribe, of all the items of income which the taxpayer received during the year for which the return is made, whether or not taxable under the provisions of this subchapter. If from a supplementary return, or otherwise, the director finds that any items of income, taxable under this subchapter, have been omitted from the original return, the director may require the items so omitted to be\n\nTue Dec 09 22:12:36 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 422 (115, 5) §422.22, INDIVIDUAL INCOME, CORPORATE, AND FRANCHISE TAXES 62\n\nadded to the original return. Such supplementary return and the correction of the original return shall not relieve the taxpayer from any of the penalties to which the taxpayer may be liable under any provisions of this subchapter, whether or not the director required a return or a supplementary return under this section. [C35, §6943-f18; C39, §6943.054; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §422.22] 2020 Acts, ch 1062, §94 Referred to in §257.22, 422.16, 422.38, 422D.3

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2001–2001 · leading case: Thies v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue (In re Thies), 269 B.R. 212 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2001).
Thies v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue (In re Thies), 269 B.R. 212 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2001). “Iowa Code § 422.22 states, in pertinent part,: If the director shall be of the opinion that any taxpayer required under this division to file a return has failed to file such a return or to include in a return filed, either intentionally or through error, items of taxable…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.