Iowa Code » Chapter 453A — CIGARETTE AND TOBACCO TAXES AND REGULATION OF ALTERNATIVE NICOTINE
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 453A.22 (2026)

Revocation — suspension — civil penalty

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. If a person holding a permit issued by the department under this subchapter, including a retailer permit for railway car, has willfully violated section 453A.2, the department shall revoke the permit upon notice and hearing. If the person violates any other provision of this subchapter, or a rule adopted under this subchapter, or is substantially delinquent in the payment of a tax administered by the department or the interest or penalty on the tax, or if the person is a corporation and if any officer having a substantial legal or equitable interest in the ownership of the corporation owes any delinquent tax of the permit-holding corporation, or interest or penalty on the tax, administered by the department, the department may revoke the permit issued to the person, after giving the permit holder an opportunity to be heard upon ten days’ written notice stating the reason for the contemplated revocation and the time and place at which the person may appear and be heard. The hearing before the department may be held at a site in the state as the department may direct. The notice shall be given by mailing a copy to the permit holder’s place of business as it appears on the application for a permit. If, upon hearing, the department finds that the violation has occurred, the department may revoke the permit.

2. If a retailer or employee of a retailer has violated section 453A.2 or section 453A.36, subsection 6, the department or local authority, or the department following transfer of the matter to the department pursuant to section 453A.2, subsection 6, in addition to the other penalties fixed for such violations in this section, shall assess a penalty upon the same hearing and notice as prescribed in subsection 1 as follows:

a. For a first violation, the retailer shall be assessed a civil penalty in the amount of three hundred dollars. Failure to pay the civil penalty as ordered under this subsection shall result in automatic suspension of the permit for a period of fourteen days.

b. For a second violation within a period of two years, the retailer shall be assessed a civil penalty in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars or the retailer’s permit shall be suspended for a period of thirty days. The retailer may select its preference in the penalty to be applied under this paragraph.

c. For a third violation within a period of three years, the retailer shall be assessed a civil penalty in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars and the retailer’s permit shall be suspended for a period of thirty days.

d. For a fourth violation within a period of three years, the retailer shall be assessed a civil penalty in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars and the retailer’s permit shall be suspended for a period of sixty days.

e. For a fifth violation within a period of four years, the retailer’s permit shall be revoked.

3. If an employee of a retailer violates section 453A.2, subsection 1, the retailer shall not be assessed a penalty under subsection 2, and the violation shall be deemed not to be a violation of section 453A.2, subsection 1, for the purpose of determining the number of violations for which a penalty may be assessed pursuant to subsection 2, if the employee holds a valid certificate of completion of the tobacco compliance employee training program pursuant to section 453A.5 at the time of the violation. A retailer may assert only once in a four-year \n Tue Dec 09 22:10:53 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 453A (63, 2) 17 CIGARETTE AND TOBACCO TAXES — NICOTINE AND VAPOR PRODUCTS, §453A.24\n\nperiod the bar under this subsection against assessment of a penalty pursuant to subsection 2, for a violation of section 453A.2, that takes place at the same place of business location.

4. If a permit is revoked a new permit shall not be issued to the permit holder for any place of business, or to any other person for the place of business at which the violation occurred, until one year has expired from the date of revocation, unless good cause to the contrary is shown to the issuing authority.

5. Notwithstanding subsection 4, if a retail permit is suspended or revoked under this section, the suspension or revocation shall only apply to the place of business at which the violation occurred and shall not apply to any other place of business to which the retail permit applies but at which the violation did not occur.

6. The local authority shall report the suspension or revocation of a retail permit under this section to the department within thirty days of the suspension or revocation of the retail permit.

7. For the purposes of this section, “retailer” means retailer as defined in sections 453A.1 and 453A.42 and “retail permit” includes permits issued to retailers under subchapter I or subchapter II of this chapter. [C24, 27, 31, 35, §1559; C39, §1556.17; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §98.22] 86 Acts, ch 1007, §6; 86 Acts, ch 1241, §2; 89 Acts, ch 251, §1; 91 Acts, ch 240, §5 C93, §453A.22 2000 Acts, ch 1105, §6, 7; 2000 Acts, ch 1232, §71, 95; 2003 Acts, ch 26, §3 – 7; 2005 Acts, ch 93, §3; 2006 Acts, ch 1030, §41; 2011 Acts, ch 63, §15, 16; 2018 Acts, ch 1041, §127; 2022 Acts, ch 1032, §63; 2023 Acts, ch 19, §2464, 2465 Referred to in §453A.2, 453A.23, 453A.47A, 453E.7 \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: Nash Finch Co. v. City Council of Cedar Rapids, 672 N.W.2d 822 (Iowa 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nash Finch Co. v. City Council of Cedar Rapids, 672 N.W.2d 822 (Iowa 2003). · cites it 10× “Nash Finch contends the district court erred in holding two company stores were the same “place of business” for purposes of aggregating offenses under Iowa *824 Code section 453A.22. Finding no error, we affirm.”
State v. Lasley, 705 N.W.2d 481 (Iowa 2005). · cites it 4× “2 include revocation of permit, see Iowa Code § 453A.22(1), and penalties, see Iowa Code § 453A.”
Beecher Store, Inc. v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue Alcoholic Beverages Div. (Iowa 2026). · cites it 10× “2d at 826 (holding that Iowa Code section 453A.22, the equivalent civil penalty 25 statute for underage tobacco sales, is ambiguous as to what constitutes a “second violation”).”
— Iowa Code § 453A.22(1) — 1 case
State v. Lasley, 705 N.W.2d 481 (Iowa 2005). “2 include revocation of permit, see Iowa Code § 453A.22(1), and penalties, see Iowa Code § 453A.”
— Iowa Code § 453A.22(2) — 3 cases
State v. Lasley, 705 N.W.2d 481 (Iowa 2005). “2 include revocation of permit, see Iowa Code § 453A.22(1), and penalties, see Iowa Code § 453A.”
Nash Finch Co. v. City Council of Cedar Rapids, 672 N.W.2d 822 (Iowa 2003). “Nash Finch contends the district court erred in holding two company stores were the same “place of business” for purposes of aggregating offenses under Iowa *824 Code section 453A.22. Finding no error, we affirm.”
Beecher Store, Inc. v. Iowa Dep't of Revenue Alcoholic Beverages Div. (Iowa 2026). “2d at 826 (holding that Iowa Code section 453A.22, the equivalent civil penalty 25 statute for underage tobacco sales, is ambiguous as to what constitutes a “second violation”).”
— Iowa Code § 453A.22(2)(a) — 1 case
Nash Finch Co. v. City Council of Cedar Rapids, 672 N.W.2d 822 (Iowa 2003). “Nash Finch contends the district court erred in holding two company stores were the same “place of business” for purposes of aggregating offenses under Iowa *824 Code section 453A.22. Finding no error, we affirm.”
— Iowa Code § 453A.22(4) — 1 case
Nash Finch Co. v. City Council of Cedar Rapids, 672 N.W.2d 822 (Iowa 2003). “Nash Finch contends the district court erred in holding two company stores were the same “place of business” for purposes of aggregating offenses under Iowa *824 Code section 453A.22. Finding no error, we affirm.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.