Iowa Code » Chapter 5 — UNIFORM STATE LAWS
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 5.1 (2026)

Commission on uniform laws — vacancies

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The governor shall appoint three commissioners, each of whom shall be a member of the bar of this state, in good standing, who shall constitute and be known as the commission on uniform state laws, and upon the death, resignation, or refusal to serve of any of the commissioners so appointed, the governor shall make an appointment to fill the vacancy so caused, such new appointment to be for the unexpired balance of the term of the original appointee. [C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §65; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §5.1]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1974–2022 · leading case: Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Bd. v. Paul J. Bieber, 824 N.W.2d 514 (Iowa 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Bd. v. Paul J. Bieber, 824 N.W.2d 514 (Iowa 2012). · cites it 2× “ence with the administration of justice, false swearing, misrepresentation, fraud, extortion, misappropriation, or theft; or the sale, distribution or importation of controlled substances; or the intentional killing of another; or an attempt or conspiracy or solicitation of…”
Kucera v. Baldazo, 745 N.W.2d 481 (Iowa 2008). · cites it 2× “The sheriff, a public employer, Baldazo, a public employee, and the union exercised *484 their statutory right to bargain and agreed, in relevant part: Section 5.1. The parties agree that an orderly and expeditious resolution of grievances is desirable.”
Iowa Supreme Court Bd. of Prof'l Ethics & Conduct v. Moorman, 683 N.W.2d 549 (Iowa 2004). “Wolfram, Modern Legal Ethics § 5.1, at 191-92 (1986); Comm, on Prof l Ethics & Conduct v.”
In re Internet Navigator Inc., 293 B.R. 198 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2003). · cites it 6× “Section 5.1 of INI!s Bylaws proscribes a means by which an INI director may secure indemnification.”
Iowa Supreme Court Bd. of Prof'l Ethics & Conduct v. McKittrick, 683 N.W.2d 554 (Iowa 2004). “Wolfram, Modern Legal Ethics § 5.1, at 191-92 (1986) [hereinafter Wolfram], Neglect generally involves more than one act or omission.”
State v. Beeman, 315 N.W.2d 770 (Iowa 1982). “See also ABA Standards Relating to Trial by Jury § 5.1 (1974). 3 . The fact that these items were discovered by the jury during deliberations and not brought to its attention by counsel earlier in the trial underscores the consequences of failing to carefully examine and…”
State v. James, 693 N.W.2d 353 (Iowa 2005). “y without a permit” from the securities commissioner? To be guilty must the seller of a security without a permit know only that what he is doing constitutes a sale, or must he also know that the thing he sells is a security, or must he also know that he has no permit to sell…”
In Re Huebner, 141 B.R. 405 (N.D. Iowa 1992). · cites it 2× “2792166) at § 5.1. In In re Gilbert, 74 B.R. 1 (Bankr.”
Carter v. Wiese Corp., 360 N.W.2d 122 (Iowa Ct. App. 1984). “2d 252, 257 (Iowa 1981) (quoting ABA' Standards for Criminal Justice, Discovery and Procedure Before Trial, § 5.1, Commentary, at 108 (1970)). In exercising its discretion in selection of sanctions for failure to comply with discovery orders, the court should keep in mind that…”
State v. Neal, 353 N.W.2d 83 (Iowa 1984). “He first complains because there is no showing by the State that a photographic identification rather than a lineup was necessary.”
State v. Marchellino, 304 N.W.2d 252 (Iowa 1981). “Because discovery standards are designed to implement, not to impede, fair and speedy determinations of cases, it is suggested “that the court should seek to apply sanctions which affect the evidence at trial and the merits of the case as little as possible .”
State v. Fowler, 248 N.W.2d 511 (Iowa 1976). “Parenthetically, Judge Steffen would have been well advised to consider ABA Standards Relating to Pretrial Release, §§ 5.1, 5.5 (Approved Draft 1968). See also People ex rel.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
— Iowa Code § 5.1(b) — 2 cases
State v. James, 693 N.W.2d 353 (Iowa 2005). “y without a permit” from the securities commissioner? To be guilty must the seller of a security without a permit know only that what he is doing constitutes a sale, or must he also know that the thing he sells is a security, or must he also know that he has no permit to sell…”
State v. Neal, 353 N.W.2d 83 (Iowa 1984). “He first complains because there is no showing by the State that a photographic identification rather than a lineup was necessary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.