In this chapter, unless the statutory context otherwise requires:
1. words in the singular number include the plural, and those in the plural include the singular; and
2. words of any gender also refer to any other gender. 2007 Acts, ch 41, §7, 57 \n Tue Dec 09 22:02:40 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 554 (108, 4) 15 UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE, §554.1201\n\n 554.1107 Section captions. Section captions are parts of this chapter. [C66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §554.1109] 2007 Acts, ch 41, §49 CS2007, §554.1107 Referred to in §3.3 \n
Notes of Decisions
Purina Mills, L.L.C. v. Less, 295 F. Supp. 2d 1017 (N.D. Iowa 2003).
· cites it 6× “” Iowa Code § 554.1106 . This sentiment is echoed in Iowa case law.”
Nora Springs Coop. Co. v. Brandau, 247 N.W.2d 744 (Iowa 1976).
· cites it 2× “Thus, when read together with section 554.1106 which mandates that remedies are to be “liberally administered to the end that the aggrieved party may be put in as good a position as if the other party had fully performed,” we might very well hold that materiality need not be…”
Kanzmeier v. McCoppin, 398 N.W.2d 826 (Iowa 1987).
· cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 554.1106 . After reviewing the record we must agree with the defendant that there is not substantial evidence that the 358 cattle purchased were a reasonable substitute for the cattle promised under the contract.”
Data Documents, Inc. v. Pottawattamie Cnty., 604 N.W.2d 611 (Iowa 2000).
“Although proof of damages need not be shown with mathematical certainty, see Uniform Commercial Code Comment 1, Iowa Code Annotated § 554.1106 (West *617 1995), plaintiff must at least present sufficient evidence to allow the factfinder to make an approximate estimate of the…”
H-W-H Cattle Co., Inc. v. Clayton Schroeder, 767 F.2d 437 (8th Cir. 1985).
“ing it a windfall, and thus violate the general principle concerning remedies underlying Article Two of the Uniform Commercial *440 Code in Iowa Code Ann. § 554.1106 , which provides: (1) The remedies provided by this Chapter shall be liberally administered to the end that the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.