Iowa Code » Chapter 554 — UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 554.2508 (2026)

Cure by seller of improper tender or delivery — replacement

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. Where any tender or delivery by the seller is rejected because nonconforming and the time for performance has not yet expired, the seller may seasonably notify the buyer of the seller’s intention to cure and may then within the contract time make a conforming delivery.

2. Where the buyer rejects a nonconforming tender which the seller had reasonable grounds to believe would be acceptable with or without money allowance the seller may if the seller seasonably notifies the buyer have a further reasonable time to substitute a conforming tender. [C66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §554.2508] Referred to in §554.2323 \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1975–2013 · leading case: Hayes v. Hettinga, 228 N.W.2d 181 (Iowa 1975).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hayes v. Hettinga, 228 N.W.2d 181 (Iowa 1975). · cites it 4× “Since time for the performance of the contract had expired, plaintiff no longer had the unfettered right to “cure” pursuant to § 554.2508(1). Plaintiff, however, might have extended the time for performance and “cure” under § 554.”
Hansen-Mueller Co. v. Gau, 838 N.W.2d 138 (Iowa Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 554.2508 (1); accord UCC § 2-508.”
— Iowa Code § 554.2508(1) — 1 case
Hayes v. Hettinga, 228 N.W.2d 181 (Iowa 1975). “Since time for the performance of the contract had expired, plaintiff no longer had the unfettered right to “cure” pursuant to § 554.2508(1). Plaintiff, however, might have extended the time for performance and “cure” under § 554.”
— Iowa Code § 554.2508(2) — 1 case
Hayes v. Hettinga, 228 N.W.2d 181 (Iowa 1975). “Since time for the performance of the contract had expired, plaintiff no longer had the unfettered right to “cure” pursuant to § 554.2508(1). Plaintiff, however, might have extended the time for performance and “cure” under § 554.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.