Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 554.3301 (2026)

Person entitled to enforce instrument

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

“Person entitled to enforce” an instrument means the holder of the instrument, a nonholder in possession of the instrument who has the rights of a holder, or a person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to section 554.3309 or

Tue Dec 09 22:02:40 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 554 (108, 4) 65 UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE, §554.3303\n\n554.3418, subsection 4. A person may be a person entitled to enforce the instrument even though the person is not the owner of the instrument or is in wrongful possession of the instrument. 94 Acts, ch 1167, §36, 121, 122; 2013 Acts, ch 30, §261 Referred to in §554.3103, 554.3308, 554.4104

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1978–2015 · leading case: US Bank Nat'l Ass'n, as Tr., Successor in Interest to Bank One, Nat'l Ass'n as Tr. for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortg. Sec. Corp., Mortg. Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-8 v. Lederman Bonding, Main Street Acquisitions Corp., & Parties in Possession, & Terry F. Rice & David A. Goings (Iowa Ct. App. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

US Bank Nat'l Ass'n, as Tr., Successor in Interest to Bank One, Nat'l Ass'n as Tr. for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortg. Sec. Corp., Mortg. Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-8 v. Lederman Bonding, Main Street Acquisitions Corp., & Parties in Possession, & Terry F. Rice & David A. Goings (Iowa Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “See Iowa Code §§ 554.3301 (stating the person entitled to enforce an instrument includes the holder of the instrument), 554.”

Woodward v. Comm'r, 37 T.C.M. 715 (Tax Ct. 1978). “3301 ↩ (West 1967). Respondent points to no defense the obligor could have asserted, other than the statute of limitations (which we have held above was not a bar to collection).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.