Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 554.9324 (2026)

Priority of purchase-money security interests

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. General rule — purchase-money priority. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, a perfected purchase-money security interest in goods other than inventory or livestock has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same goods, and, except as otherwise provided in section 554.9327, a perfected security interest in its identifiable proceeds also has priority, if the purchase-money security interest is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the collateral or within twenty days thereafter.

2. Inventory purchase-money priority. Subject to subsection 3 and except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, a perfected purchase-money security interest in inventory has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same inventory, has priority over a conflicting security interest in chattel paper or an instrument constituting proceeds of the inventory and in proceeds of the chattel paper, if so provided in section 554.9330, and, except as otherwise provided in section 554.9327, also has priority in identifiable cash proceeds\n\nTue Dec 09 22:02:42 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 554 (108, 4) §554.9324, UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE 182\n\nof the inventory to the extent the identifiable cash proceeds are received on or before the delivery of the inventory to a buyer, if:

a. the purchase-money security interest is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the inventory;

b. the purchase-money secured party sends a signed notification to the holder of the conflicting security interest;

c. the holder of the conflicting security interest receives the notification within five years before the debtor receives possession of the inventory; and

d. the notification states that the person sending the notification has or expects to acquire a purchase-money security interest in inventory of the debtor and describes the inventory.

3. Holders of conflicting inventory security interests to be notified. Subsection 2, paragraphs “b” through “d”, apply only if the holder of the conflicting security interest had filed a financing statement covering the same types of inventory:

a. if the purchase-money security interest is perfected by filing, before the date of the filing; or

b. if the purchase-money security interest is temporarily perfected without filing or possession under section 554.9312, subsection 6, before the beginning of the twenty-day period thereunder.

4. Livestock purchase-money priority. Subject to subsection 5 and except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, a perfected purchase-money security interest in livestock that are farm products has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same livestock, and, except as otherwise provided in section 554.9327, a perfected security interest in their identifiable proceeds and identifiable products in their unmanufactured states also has priority, if:

a. the purchase-money security interest is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the livestock;

b. the purchase-money secured party sends a signed notification to the holder of the conflicting security interest;

c. the holder of the conflicting security interest receives the notification within six months before the debtor receives possession of the livestock; and

d. the notification states that the person sending the notification has or expects to acquire a purchase-money security interest in livestock of the debtor and describes the livestock.

5. Holders of conflicting livestock security interests to be notified. Subsection 4, paragraphs “b” through “d”, apply only if the holder of the conflicting security interest had filed a financing statement covering the same types of livestock:

a. if the purchase-money security interest is perfected by filing, before the date of the filing; or

b. if the purchase-money security interest is temporarily perfected without filing or possession under section 554.9312, subsection 6, before the beginning of the twenty-day period thereunder.

6. Software purchase-money priority. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, a perfected purchase-money security interest in software has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same collateral, and, except as otherwise provided in section 554.9327, a perfected security interest in its identifiable proceeds also has priority, to the extent that the purchase-money security interest in the goods in which the software was acquired for use has priority in the goods and proceeds of the goods under this section.

7. Conflicting purchase-money security interests. If more than one security interest qualifies for priority in the same collateral under subsection 1, 2, 4, or 6:

a. a security interest securing an obligation incurred as all or part of the price of the collateral has priority over a security interest securing an obligation incurred for value given to enable the debtor to acquire rights in or the use of collateral; and

b. in all other cases, section 554.9322, subsection 1, applies to the qualifying security interests. 2000 Acts, ch 1149, §44, 187; 2024 Acts, ch 1023, §70, 71 Referred to in §554.9325\n\nTue Dec 09 22:02:42 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 554 (108, 4) 183 UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE, §554.9327 \n

Notes of Decisions
The Sec. Nat'l Bank of Sioux City, Iowa, as the duly appointed Pers. Rep. of the Est. of Roger E. Rand v. Frank H. Welte II, Diane Welte, Matthew Welte, Welte Flats Farms, Inc., BJM, Inc., W. Slopes Farms, Valley Flats Farms, Inc. & Donald Molstad (Iowa Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “” Iowa Code § 554.9324 (1). 8 B could have investigated the source of the equipment and discovered SP-A’s filing before making an advance against the equipment, whereas SP-A had no reason to search the filings against someone other than its debtor, A.”
Quality Plus Feeds, Inc. v. Compeer Fin., FLCA (Iowa 2023). · cites it 2× “See Iowa Code § 554.9324 (1). Special status is accorded to the PMSI based on the familiar rationale that the PMSI holder—like the feed supplier—has provided added value to the herd, specifically by providing funds enabling the purchase of additional cattle.”
Quality Plus Feeds, Inc. v. Compeer Fin., FLCA (Iowa 2023). · cites it 2× “See Iowa Code § 554.9324 (1). Special status is accorded to the PMSI based on the familiar rationale that the PMSI holder—like the feed supplier—has provided added value to the herd, specifically by providing funds enabling the purchase of additional cattle.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.