Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 572.24 (2026)

Time of bringing action — court

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. An action to enforce a mechanic’s lien, or an action brought upon any bond given in lieu thereof, may be commenced in the district court after said lien is perfected. 2. An action to challenge a mechanic’s lien may be commenced in the district court or small claims court if the amount of the lien is within jurisdictional limits. Any permissible claim or counterclaim meeting subject matter and jurisdictional requirements may be joined with the action. The court shall make written findings regarding the lawful amount and the validity of the mechanic’s lien. In addition to any other appropriate order, the court may enter judgment on a permissibly joined claim or counterclaim. If the court determines that the mechanic’s lien is invalid, valid for a lesser amount, frivolous, fraudulent, forfeited, expired, or for any other reason unenforceable, the clerk of the district court shall submit the ruling to the administrator who shall make a posting to the mechanics’ notice and lien registry internet site regarding the proper amount of the lien or, if warranted, canceling the lien. [R60, §1856; C73, §2142, 2143; C97, §3098; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §10293; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §572.24] 99 Acts, ch 79, §2; 2012 Acts, ch 1105, §18, 27, 28; 2012 Acts, ch 1138, §13, 40, 43; 2013 Acts, ch 90, §257 Referred to in §631.1

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Core Structural Servs., LLC v. Neumann Bros., Inc., North Cent. States Reg'l Council of Carpenters & Fed. Ins. Co. (Iowa Ct. App. 2021).
Core Structural Servs., LLC v. Neumann Bros., Inc., North Cent. States Reg'l Council of Carpenters & Fed. Ins. Co. (Iowa Ct. App. 2021). “See Iowa Code § 572.24 (2) (“The court shall make written findings regarding the lawful amount and the validity of the mechanic’s lien.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.