Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 598.9 (2026)

Residence — failure of proof

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the averments as to residence are not fully proved, the hearing shall proceed no further, and the action be dismissed by the court. [C73, §2222; C97, §3173; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §10473; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, §598.6; C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §598.9]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1947–2002 · leading case: Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U.S. 393 (1975).
Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U.S. 393 (1975). · cites it 2× “" Iowa Code § 598.9 (1973) requires dismissal of the action "[i]f the averments as to residence are not fully proved.”
Sosna v. State of Iowa, 360 F. Supp. 1182 (N.D. Iowa 1973). · cites it 8× “Keck, a co-defendant herein, in ruling on a special appearance of respondent, dismissed the petition pursuant to Iowa Code § 598.9 (1971) [2] for want of jurisdiction.”
Fritz v. Fritz, 148 N.W.2d 392 (Iowa 1967). · cites it 2× “” Section 598.9 provides: “The husband may obtain a divorce from the wife for like cause, * ’* *.”
Zuerrer v. Zuerrer, 27 N.W.2d 260 (Iowa 1947). · cites it 2× “” Section 598.9, Code of 1946, provides: “The husband may obtain a divorce from the wife for like cause * * Section 598.”
In Re the Marriage of Bouska, 256 N.W.2d 196 (Iowa 1977). · cites it 2× “Respondent's motion to vacate the decree and dismiss the petition was predicated solely on a claim the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction.”
Kayser v. Kayser, 164 N.W.2d 95 (Iowa 1969). · cites it 2× “” Section 598.9 provides: “The husband may obtain a divorce from the wife for like cause, * * Section 598.”
In Re Est. of Carlisle, 653 N.W.2d 368 (Iowa 2002). · cites it 2× “8 (hearing procedures); § 598.9 (residence and failure of proof); § 598.”
Bunger v. Bunger, 90 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 1958). · cites it 2× “8(2) Iowa Code 1958: “Divorces from the bonds of matrimony may be decreed against the husband for the following causes: * * * 2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.