No contract can be thus disaffirmed in cases where, on account of the minor’s own
misrepresentations as to the minor’s majority, or from the minor’s having engaged in business
as an adult, the other party had good reason to believe the minor capable of contracting.
[C51, §1489; R60, §2541; C73, §2239; C97, §3190; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §10494; C46, 50, 54,
58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §599.3]
\n
Notes of Decisions
Martin v. Stewart Motor Sales, 73 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 1955).
· cites it 4× “As noted in the majority opinion under section 599.3, 1954 Code of Iowa, I.C.A. there can be no disaffirmance of a minor's contract where by reason of the minor's own misrepresentation as to his majority, or from having engaged in business as an adult, the other party had good…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.