Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 636.47 (2026)

Deposit and joint control agreements

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It shall be lawful for any party of whom a bond, undertaking or other obligation is required, to agree with the party’s surety or sureties for the deposit of any or all moneys and assets for which the party and the party’s surety or sureties are or may be held responsible, with a bank, savings bank, safe-deposit or trust company, authorized by law to do business as such, or with other depository approved by the court if such deposit is otherwise proper, for

\n

Tue Dec 09 21:58:30 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 636 (36, 0) §636.47, SURETIES — FIDUCIARIES — TRUSTS — INVESTMENTS 12\n\nthe safekeeping thereof, and in such manner as to prevent the withdrawal of such money or assets or any part thereof, without the written consent of such surety or sureties, or an order of court made on such notice to such surety or sureties as such court may direct; provided, however, that such agreement shall not in any manner release from or change the liability of the principal or sureties as established by the terms of the said bond. [C54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §682.47] C93, §636.47 Authority for fiduciary and surety to enter into agreement for deposit of property or joint control, see §633.183\n\n 636.48 through 636.59 Reserved.\n\n SUBCHAPTER VII TRUSTS NOT IN PROBATE COURT

\n

636.60 through 636.61 Repealed by 2005 Acts, ch 38, §50.\n\nTue Dec 09 21:58:30 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 636 (36, 0)

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1951–1951 · leading case: Bird v. Plunkett, 17 Conn. Super. Ct. 368 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1951).
Bird v. Plunkett, 17 Conn. Super. Ct. 368 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1951). “Thus the states of Mississippi, Iowa and Tennessee have enacted legisla' tion depriving a person wilfully causing the death of another of the right to inherit from such other as if the person causing the death had never been in existence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.