Iowa Code » Chapter 650 — DISPUTED CORNERS AND BOUNDARIES
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 650.15 (2026)

Appeal

✓ Iowa Code 2026 (laws through the 2025 session)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

There shall be no appeal in such proceeding, except from final judgment of the court, taken in the time and manner that other appeals are, and heard as in an action by ordinary proceedings. [C97, §4237; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §12307; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §650.15]

\n

Tue Dec 09 21:58:12 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 650 (17, 0) 3 DISPUTED CORNERS AND BOUNDARIES, §650.17

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1948–2026 · leading case: Patsy C. Albert v. Delbert Conger, 886 N.W.2d 877 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Patsy C. Albert v. Delbert Conger, 886 N.W.2d 877 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 6× “2d 174, 177 (Iowa 2001), our appellate standard of review of an acquiescence claim is statutorily defined as correction of errors at law, 2 see Iowa Code § 650.15 . In *880 any event, we will review the district court’s disposition of this claim de novo for two reasons: (1) the…”
Ryan v. Arneson, 422 N.W.2d 491 (Iowa 1988). · cites it 2× “The court of appeals awarded the Arnesons an additional $1000 of attorney fees and remanded the case. II. Quieting Title.”
Tewes v. Pine Lane Farms, Inc., 522 N.W.2d 801 (Iowa 1994). · cites it 2× “The district court concluded that Pine Lane gave Tewes fair notice of its boundary line claim by virtue of paragraphs 3,4, and 5 in Pine Lane’s answer, Pine Lane had established by clear proof each of the elements of both acquiescence and adverse possession, and thereby Pine…”
Dart v. Thompson, 154 N.W.2d 82 (Iowa 1967). · cites it 2× “Reference will later be made to other relevant facts. I. At the outset a procedural question is presented.”
Trimpl v. Meyer, 71 N.W.2d 437 (Iowa 1955). · cites it 2× “While we give weight to the trial court’s decision our review in this and other equity cases is de novo. Rule 334, Rules of Civil Procedure.”
Drake v. Claar, 339 N.W.2d 844 (Iowa Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “” Iowa Code § 650.15 ; Brown v. McDaniel, 261 Iowa 730, 732 , 156 N.”
Eggers v. Mitchem, 34 N.W.2d 603 (Iowa 1948). · cites it 2× “Section 650.15, Code of 1946; Concannon v.”
Cozad v. Strack, 119 N.W.2d 266 (Iowa 1963). · cites it 2× “Following trial to the court plaintiffs had judgment on both counts. Defendants appeal. We first consider the appeal from-the judgment on Count I.”
Mahrenholz v. Alff, 112 N.W.2d 847 (Iowa 1962). · cites it 2× “We entertain no doubt our review in this and other equity cases is de novo. Rule 334, Rules of Civil Procedure.”
Allen v. Melson, 150 N.W.2d 292 (Iowa 1967). · cites it 2× “” Section 650.15, Code of Iowa. Our review is not de novo.”
Dillon v. Chicago & Nw. Ry. Co., 124 N.W.2d 543 (Iowa 1963). · cites it 2× “Under section 650.15 this appeal is heard as in an aetion by ordinary proceedings.”
Saunders v. Snyder-Johnson, 987 N.W.2d 451 (Iowa Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “Standard of Review Terrill brought his boundary-by-acquiescence claim under Iowa Code chapter 650 (2019).”
Show all 17 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.