Iowa Code » Chapter 684A — QUESTIONS OF LAW IN SUPREME COURT CERTIFIED
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 684A.3 (2026)

Contents of certification order

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A certification order shall set forth the questions of law to be answered and a statement of facts relevant to the questions certified, showing fully the nature of the controversy in which the questions arose. [C81, §684A.3]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2013 · leading case: Foley v. Argosy Gaming Co., 688 N.W.2d 244 (Iowa 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Foley v. Argosy Gaming Co., 688 N.W.2d 244 (Iowa 2004). · cites it 4× “Iowa Code § 684A.3 (2003). In 2001, John Foley and Interim Holdings (Foley) sued Argosy Gaming Company in the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County for malicious prosecution.”
Life Investors Ins. Co. of Am. v. Est. of John M. Corrado & Fed. City Region, Inc., 838 N.W.2d 640 (Iowa 2013). · cites it 2× “The district court also provided us with a statement of facts pursuant to Iowa Code section 684A.3. The statement of facts provides: Beginning in 1977, John Corrado and his company, Federal City Region (FCR), collectively Corrado,- marketed insurance products underwritten by…”
Maguire v. Pabst Brewing Co., 387 N.W.2d 565 (Iowa 1986). · cites it 2× “We find the additional certified facts to be illuminating and helpful with respect to our determination of the legal questions which have been presented and consistent with section 684A.3 which provides that the purpose of certified facts is to show “the nature of the…”
Hagen v. Siouxland Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C., 964 F. Supp. 2d 951 (N.D. Iowa 2013). · cites it 2× “” Iowa Code § 684A.3. Unless I note otherwise, the following facts are presented “in the light most favorable to the jury verdict, assuming all conflicts in the evidence were resolved in [the Plaintiffs] favor, and giving Plaintiff[ ] the benefit of all reasonable inferences…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.