1. Whenever the governor is satisfied that a crime has been committed within the state, punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of ten years or more, and the person committing the same has not been arrested or has escaped from arrest or custody or the person’s whereabouts is unknown, the governor may in the governor’s discretion, offer a reward not exceeding five hundred dollars for the arrest and delivery to the proper authorities of such persons, which reward, upon the certificate of the governor that the same has been earned, shall be audited and paid by the state.
2. The reward shall be paid only upon the conviction of the person, and if appealed, only after a final decision of an appellate court has been rendered which affirms that conviction. [R60, §57; C73, §58; C97, §62; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §83; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §7.6] \n 7.7 Accounting. All fees paid to the governor shall be turned over to the treasurer of state. [SS15, §4-e; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §84; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §7.7] \n
Notes of Decisions
Sain v. Cedar Rapids Cmty. Sch. Dist., 626 N.W.2d 115 (Iowa 2001).
· cites it 4× “, The Law of Torts § 7.6, at 412-13 (2d ed.1986) [hereinafter Harper] ("remedy for negligent misrepresentation [is] principally against those who advise in an essentially nonadversarial capacity").”
Haupt v. Miller, 514 N.W.2d 905 (Iowa 1994).
· cites it 2× “, The Law of Torts § 7.6, at 412-13 (1986) (the tort of negligent misrepresentation is applied principally against those who advise in a nonadversarial capacity).”
Armstrong v. Am. Pallet Leasing Inc., 678 F. Supp. 2d 827 (N.D. Iowa 2009).
· cites it 2× “, The Law of Torts § 7.6, at 412-13 (2d ed.1986) [hereinafter Harper] (“remedy for negligent misrepresentation [is] principally against those who advise in an essentially nonadversarial capacity”).”
Meier v. Alfa-Laval, Inc., 454 N.W.2d 576 (Iowa 1990).
· cites it 2× “The difference in liability for misinformation between a vendor of merchandise and a person supplying information and advice because of a special relationship between the parties is discussed in 1 F.”
Conveyor Co. v. Sunsource Tech. Servs., Inc., 398 F. Supp. 2d 992 (N.D. Iowa 2005).
· cites it 2× “, The Law of Torts § 7.6, at 412-13 (2d ed.1986) [hereinafter Harper] (“remedy for negligent misrepresentation [is] principally against those who advise in an essentially nonadversarial capacity”).”
McLeodUSA Telecomm. Servs., Inc. v. Qwest Corp., 469 F. Supp. 2d 677 (N.D. Iowa 2007).
· cites it 2× “, The Law of Torts § 7.6, at 412-13 (2d ed.1986) [hereinafter Harper] (“remedy for negligent misrepresentation [is] principally against those who advise in an essentially nonadversarial capacity”).”
Beeck v. Kapalis, 302 N.W.2d 90 (Iowa 1981).
“See Kooyman, 267 N.W.2d at 404 . IV. Negligent misrepresentation.”
Whalen v. Connelly, 545 N.W.2d 284 (Iowa 1996).
“Farnsworth, Contracts § 7.6, at 492-93 (2d ed. 1990). We have held the parol evidence rule applies where a “handcrafted contract contains an integration clause, where the parties were sophisticated business persons represented by counsel and of equal bargaining strength, and…”
Montgomery v. Engel, 179 N.W.2d 478 (Iowa 1970).
· cites it 2× “The specification read: “(b) They failed to maintain said stairway in sound condition and in a reasonably good state of maintenance and repair in violation of subsection 7.6 of Chapter 156.7 of the Municipal Ordinances of the City of Sioux City, commonly referred to as the…”
Hackett v. State, 354 N.W.2d 247 (Iowa Ct. App. 1984).
“615 § 7.6(2). The reason for the delay was not established.”
Iowa Code § 7.6(2): 1 case
Hackett v. State, 354 N.W.2d 247 (Iowa Ct. App. 1984).
“615 § 7.6(2). The reason for the delay was not established.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.