Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 709.5 (2026)
Resistance to sexual abuse
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Under the provisions of this chapter it shall not be necessary to establish physical resistance by a person in order to establish that an act of sexual abuse was committed by force or against the will of the person. However, the circumstances surrounding the commission of the act may be considered in determining whether or not the act was done by force or against the will of the other. [C79, 81, §709.5] 99 Acts, ch 159, §5
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1957–2025 · leading case: State of Iowa v. Randy Scott Meyers, 799 N.W.2d 132 (Iowa 2011).
State of Iowa v. Randy Scott Meyers, 799 N.W.2d 132 (Iowa 2011). “” Iowa Code § 709.5 . Thus, nonconsent under the “against the will” language of section 709.”
State v. Kittelson, 164 N.W.2d 157 (Iowa 1969). “Larceny in the daytime, Code, section 709.5 was not submitted. The jury found defendant guilty of larceny in the nighttime.”
State v. Bauer, 324 N.W.2d 320 (Iowa 1982). “The trial court submitted the case on an improper standard of proof concerning consent, contrary to the provisions of Iowa Code section 709.5. 2. The trial court erred in admitting evidence of a defendant’s prior arrests.”
State v. Bolsinger, 709 N.W.2d 560 (Iowa 2006). “) The court stated that its authority for giving this instruction was found in Iowa Code section 709.5, which provides: Under the provisions of this chapter it shall not be necessary to establish physical resistance by a person in order to establish that an act of sexual abuse…”
State v. Christensen, 414 N.W.2d 843 (Iowa Ct. App. 1987). “The supreme court began its analysis of this claim by noting Iowa Code section 709.5 (1979) which provides as follows: Under the provisions of this chapter it shall not be necessary to establish physical resistance by a participant in order to establish that an act of sexual…”
State v. Stevens, 289 N.W.2d 592 (Iowa 1980). “Section 709.5 in the chapter on sexual abuse provides: Under the provisions of this chapter it shall not be necessary to establish physical resistance by a participant in order to establish that an act of sexual abuse was committed by force or against the will of the participant.”
State v. Wright, 191 N.W.2d 638 (Iowa 1971). “Defendant was charged with the crime of larceny in violation of section 709.5, The Code. Upon trial to a jury he was convicted and thereafter sentenced to a term of not more than five years in the Men’s Reformatory.”
State v. Shilinsky, 81 N.W.2d 444 (Iowa 1957). “The trial court stated when the defendant was brought in for resentencing on April 13 that he had overlooked the fact that section 709.5, for violation of which defendant was convicted, does not provide for a jail term.”
State v. Burgs, 479 N.W.2d 323 (Iowa 1992). “See Iowa Code §§ 709.5 (1976), 711.2 (1989). First-degree robbery is a forcible felony.”
State v. Sallis, 238 N.W.2d 799 (Iowa 1976). “Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for larceny in violation of § 709.5, The Code. He contends the State’s evidence was insufficient to negative his defense of alibi and was insufficient in any event to establish the elements of the offense because it consisted of the…”
State v. Vander Esch, 662 N.W.2d 689 (Iowa Ct. App. 2002). “The district court looked at section 709.5, which states, “the circumstances surrounding the commission of the act may be considered in determining whether or not the act was done by force or against the will of the other.”
State v. Hamilton, 179 N.W.2d 369 (Iowa 1970). “Defendant was convicted of the crime of larceny from a building in the daytime in violation of section 709.5, Code, 1966. On conviction he was sentenced to serve a term of not more than five years in the penitentiary, and appeals from such judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.