Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 714H.1 (2026)
Title
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act”. 2009 Acts, ch 167, §1, 9
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2015–2024 · leading case: Pauline McKee v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. & Ioc Black Hawk Cnty., Inc., 864 N.W.2d 518 (Iowa 2015).
Pauline McKee v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. & Ioc Black Hawk Cnty., Inc., 864 N.W.2d 518 (Iowa 2015). “See Iowa Code § 714H.1. It prohibits certain unfair and fraudulent acts: A person shall not engage in a practice or act the person knows or reasonably should know is an unfair practice, deception, fraud, false pretense, or false promise, or the misrepresentation, concealment,…”
Montoya v. CRST Expedited, Inc., 311 F. Supp. 3d 411 (D.D.C. 2018). “Count III arises under the Iowa Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act ("Consumer Frauds Act"), Iowa Code § 714H.1, et seq. It alleges that CRST engaged in a variety of consumer frauds, such as misleading drivers about "free" training, charging drivers more than their…”
Chapman v. Gen. Motors LLC (E.D. Mich. 2023). “This class seeks certification of claims under: (i) the Iowa Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act, Iowa Code Ann. § 714H.1 et seq. [Count Q.”
Amended August 6, 2015 Pauline McKee v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. & IOC Black Hawk Cnty., Inc. (Iowa 2015). “See Iowa Code § 714H.1. It prohibits certain unfair and fraudulent acts: A person shall not engage in a practice or act the person knows or reasonably should know is an unfair practice, deception, fraud, false pretense, or false promise, or the misrepresentation, concealment,…”
Panther Deng v. Curtis White, Fam. Plan 2000, & JACD-S Inc. (Iowa Ct. App. 2019). “See Iowa Code § 714H.1 (2016). Deng maintained the Defendants’ eviction of her from the rental property despite having received the DMMHA’s rent payment was a deceptive and unfair act within the meaning of the IPRACFA.”
Huston v. Conagra Brands, Inc. (C.D. Ill. 2022). “§§ 4-88 -101–1005, and the Iowa Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act, Iowa Code Ann. §§ 714H.1–H.8. See Compl. 12 n.”
Montoya v. CRST Expedited, Inc. (D. Mass. 2018). “Count III arises under the Iowa Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act (“Consumer Frauds Act”), Iowa Code § 714H.1, et seq. It alleges that CRST engaged in a variety of consumer frauds, such as misleading drivers about “free” training, charging drivers more than their…”
Montoya v. CRST Expedited, Inc. (D. Mass. 2019). “2(91A) (Count II); violation of the Iowa Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act, Iowa Code § 714H.1 et seq. (Count III); and violation of Iowa usury laws, Iowa Code § 535.”
Chapman v. Gen. Motors LLC (E.D. Mich. 2023). “All persons who purchased one or more of the Class Vehicles from a GM-authorized dealership in Iowa from March 1, 2010, to the date of the Court-ordered notice to the Certified Iowa Class, on a claim under the Iowa Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act, Iowa Code Ann.…”
Chapman v. Gen. Motors LLC (E.D. Mich. 2023). “Iowa Class: All persons who purchased one or more of the Class Vehicles from a GM-authorized dealership in Iowa from March 1, 2010, to the date of the Court-ordered notice to the Certified Iowa Class, on a claim under the Iowa Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act,…”
Rickman v. BMW of North Am. LLC (D.N.J. 2020). “Iowa’s Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act (Count 61) Defendants argue that the Iowa Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act, Iowa Code § 714H.1 et seq., requires that class actions under that act secure pre-clearance from the attorney general.”
Hicks v. L'Oreal U.S.A., Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2023). “Trembly brings a claim under the Iowa Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act, Iowa Code §§ 714H.1 et seq., on behalf of herself and the Iowa subclass (Tenth Cause of Action).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.