Iowa Code » Chapter 8 — DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT — BUDGET AND FINANCIAL CONTROL ACT
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 8.3 (2026)

Governor

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The governor of the state shall have:

1. Direct and effective financial supervision over all departments and establishments, and every state agency by whatever name now or hereafter called, including the same power and supervision over such private corporations, persons and organizations that may receive, pursuant to statute, any funds, either appropriated by, or collected for, the state, or any of its departments, boards, commissions, institutions, divisions and agencies.

2. The efficient and economical administration of all departments and establishments of the government.

3. The initiation and preparation of a balanced budget of any and all revenues and expenditures for each regular session of the legislature. [C35, §84-e3; C39, §84.03; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §8.3]\n\nTue Dec 09 22:34:24 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 8 (112, 1) §8.3A, DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT — BUDGET AND FINANCIAL CONTROL ACT 4 \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1977–2025 · leading case: William L. Burkhalter v. Steven P. Burkhalter, 841 N.W.2d 93 (Iowa 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
William L. Burkhalter v. Steven P. Burkhalter, 841 N.W.2d 93 (Iowa 2013). · cites it 8× “Restatement (Third) of Property: Wills and Other Donative Transfers § 8.3 cmt. b, at 144 (2003) [hereinafter Restatement (Third) ].”
State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl Becker, 818 N.W.2d 135 (Iowa 2012). · cites it 4× “LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law § 8.3(d), at 607 (2d ed. 2003). LaFave agrees that many jurisdictions do not require an instruction and notes that “[t]he questionable explanation for [the majority] position is that such an instruction would distract the jury from the insanity…”
Optimal Interiors, LLC v. Hon Co., 774 F. Supp. 2d 993 (S.D. Iowa 2011). · cites it 16× “Section 8.3 of the Agreement provided that one party may *1001 unilaterally terminate the Agreement if the other party materially breached the terms of the Agreement and failed to cure: Termination for Material Breach.”
In the Matter of the Est. of Margaret E. Workman, Dennis Workman v. Gary Workman, Individually & as of the Est. of Margaret E. Workman, 903 N.W.2d 170 (Iowa 2017). · cites it 4× “On the former point, Dennis urged adoption of the Restatement (Third) of Property: Wills and Other Donative Transfers section 8.3, comment/, which provides that [a] presumption of undue influence arises if the alleged wrongdoer was in a confidential relationship with the donor…”
AFSCME/Iowa Council 61 v. State, 484 N.W.2d 390 (Iowa 1992). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 8.3 (3) requires the governor to initiate and prepare a balanced budget for each regular legislative session.”
Bowman v. Bennett, 250 N.W.2d 47 (Iowa 1977). “1965); Marshall, Iowa Title Opinions, § 8.3, at 179 (1963); 25 Am.Jur.2d, Dower and Curtesy, §§ 115-116; 28 C.”
Se. Cmty. Coll. v. Krieger, 535 N.W.2d 140 (Iowa Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “Section 8.3 of the master contract, states in part: Within a given discipline, program, service area, or combination of same, the employee to be retrenched shall be the least senior employee who is certified and approved to perform the assignment contemplated.”
United States v. Hephner, 260 F. Supp. 2d 763 (N.D. Iowa 2003). · cites it 2× “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 8.3(g). The United States Supreme Court adopted the “apparent authority” doctrine in Illinois v.”
Howard v. Coventry Health Care of Iowa, Inc., 158 F. Supp. 2d 937 (S.D. Iowa 2001). “CooKE, ERISA PRACTICE And PROCEDURE § 8.3 (citing 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(1)(B)).”
State of Iowa v. Bryan Jeffrey Stone (Iowa Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “Did the deputy seize Stone during their initial conversation? To start, we analyze Deputy Wingert’s first interaction with Stone—what the district court called their “window-to-window encounter.” If that encounter was not a “seizure,” then Stone cannot claim that it violated his…”
Polly Carver-Kimm v. Kim Reynolds, Pat Garrett, & State of Iowa & Gerd Clabaugh, Sarah Reisetter, & Susan Dixon (Iowa 2023). · cites it 2× “IV, § 8, or the statutory power to direct “efficient and economical administration of all departments and establishments of the govern- ment,” Iowa Code § 8.3 (2), as Carver-Kimm recites, don’t generate the authority she invites.”
Polly Carver-Kimm v. Kim Reynolds, Pat Garrett, & State of Iowa & Gerd Clabaugh, Sarah Reisetter, & Susan Dixon (Iowa 2023). · cites it 2× “IV, § 8, or the statutory power to direct “efficient and economical administration of all departments and establishments of the govern- ment,” Iowa Code § 8.3 (2), as Carver-Kimm recites, don’t generate the authority she invites.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
— Iowa Code § 8.3(d) — 1 case
State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl Becker, 818 N.W.2d 135 (Iowa 2012). “LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law § 8.3(d), at 607 (2d ed. 2003). LaFave agrees that many jurisdictions do not require an instruction and notes that “[t]he questionable explanation for [the majority] position is that such an instruction would distract the jury from the insanity…”
— Iowa Code § 8.3(g) — 1 case
United States v. Hephner, 260 F. Supp. 2d 763 (N.D. Iowa 2003). “LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 8.3(g). The United States Supreme Court adopted the “apparent authority” doctrine in Illinois v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.