Iowa Code » Chapter 810 — NONTESTIMONIAL IDENTIFICATION
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 810.1 (2026)

Definition

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter, the term “nontestimonial identification” includes, but is not limited to, identification by fingerprints, palm prints, footprints, measurements, hair strands, handwriting samples, voice samples, photographs, blood and saliva samples, ultraviolet or black-light examinations, paraffin tests, and lineups. [C79, 81, §810.1]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2023 · leading case: State v. Marti, 290 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Marti, 290 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1980). · cites it 2× “Section 810.1 of the Code lists examples of “nontestimonial identification” devices included within the definition of that term.”
Bousman v. Iowa Dist. Court for Clinton Cnty., 630 N.W.2d 789 (Iowa 2001). · cites it 2× “§ 810.1. A district judge or district associate judge may issue a nontestimonial identification order only upon application of a prosecuting attorney who is investigating a felony offense.”
State v. Ripperger, 514 N.W.2d 740 (Iowa Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code §§ 810.1 and 810.6 (1991). Iowa Code section 810.”
United States v. Askew, 529 F.3d 1119 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “§ 19-625 ; Iowa Code Ann. §§ 810.1 to .8; N.J. Ct. R.”
In re Nontestimonial Identification Order Directed to R.H., 762 A.2d 1239 (Vt. 2000). “§ 19-625 (1987); Iowa Code Ann. § 810.1 -.2 (West 1978 and Supp.”
Jose Luis Aguilar Olvera v. State of Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “See Iowa Code § 810.1 (2013). The postconviction court explained a “subtext to Aguilar’s claim” was that “he may not have understood the procedures because his first language is not English.”
State of Iowa v. Keith Michael Moss (Iowa Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “” Iowa Code § 810.1 . 3 Because of this claim’s constitutional underpinnings, we review it de novo.”
In Re Rh, 762 A.2d 1239 (Vt. 2000). “§ 19-625 (1987); Iowa Code Ann. § 810.1 -.2 (West 1978 and Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.