Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 85.25 (2026)

Service of notice

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The notice may be served on anyone upon whom an original notice may be served in civil cases. Service may be made by any person, who shall make return verified by affidavit upon a copy of the notice, showing the date and place of service and upon whom served; but no special form of the return of service of the notice shall be required. It shall be sufficient if the\n\nTue Dec 09 22:29:52 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 85 (59, 0) §85.25, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION 8\n\nfacts therefrom can be reasonably ascertained. The return of service may be amended at any time. [S13, §2477-m8; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §1385; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §85.25] Service of notice, R.C.P. 1.305, 1.306

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1932–2009 · leading case: Boehme v. Fareway Stores, Inc., 762 N.W.2d 142 (Iowa 2009).
Boehme v. Fareway Stores, Inc., 762 N.W.2d 142 (Iowa 2009). · cites it 2× “commissioner affirmed both rulings and also determined Boehme had failed to preserve error with respect to two issues: whether equitable estoppel precludes Fareway from asserting a statute-of-limitations defense, and whether future credits from a third-party settlement should be…”
Schmid v. Auto. Underwriters, Inc., 244 N.W. 729 (Iowa 1932). · cites it 3× “26 , reading on page 28: “Although the defendant did not voluntarily insert the pro *177 visions of Sections 85.25 and 204.30 in its policy, the law imputes such provisions to the policy whether written therein or not.”
James Boehme Vs. Fareway Stores, Inc. & Iowa Ins. Guar. Ass'n, On Behalf Of Home Ins. Co., In Insolvency (Iowa 2009). · cites it 2× “commissioner affirmed both rulings and also determined Boehme had failed to preserve error with respect to two issues: whether equitable estoppel precludes Fareway from asserting a statute-of-limitations defense, and whether future credits from a third-party settlement should be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.