K.S.A. » Chapter 12
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 12-701 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

12-701.

History: L. 1923, ch. 92, § 1; R.S. 1923, § 12-701; L. 1931, ch. 110, § 1; Repealed, L. 1991, ch. 56, § 28; January 1, 1992.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1979–2009 · leading case: City of Salina v. Jaggers, 612 P.2d 618 (Kan. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Salina v. Jaggers, 612 P.2d 618 (Kan. 1980). · cites it 5× “K.S.A. 12-701 through 12-735 encompass the city planning and zoning statutes.”
Moore v. City of Lawrence, 654 P.2d 445 (Kan. 1982). · cites it 2× “The provisions of K.S.A. 12-701 et seq., pertain to city planning and subdivision regulations.”
Zimmerman v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 218 P.3d 400 (Kan. 2009). “, K.S.A. 12-701 et seq. Addi *969 tionally, as more fully discussed later on the issue of state preemption, Intervenors themselves argue that commercial power, e.”
Reeves v. Bd. of Johnson Cnty. Comm'rs, 602 P.2d 93 (Kan. 1979). · cites it 2× “323 , K.S.A. 12-701, et seq., and all the other authorities cited and this Court cannot recognize that its concept is in conflict with those cited.”
Crumbaker v. Hunt Midwest Mining, Inc., 69 P.3d 601 (Kan. 2003). ““Kansas statutes regarding zoning are found at K.S.A. 12-701 et seq., for cities and joint committees of city and county planning boards, and at K.”
Sec. Nat'l Bank v. City of Olathe, 589 P.2d 589 (Kan. 1979). · cites it 2× “The statutes governing the issues herein are K.S.A. 12-701, et seq. and with particular reference to K.”
Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of Lawrence, 927 F.2d 1111 (10th Cir. 1991). “Kan.Stat.Ann. §§ 12-701 through -736 (1982).”
Johnson Cnty. Mem'l Gardens, Inc. v. City of Overland Park, 718 P.2d 1302 (Kan. 1986). “The planning and zoning power of Kansas municipalities is derived from the grant contained in K.S.A. 12-701 et seq. Under K.S.A. 12-707, a city is authorized to divide the land within its boundaries into zones or districts.”
Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs Co. v. City of Lawrence, 715 F. Supp. 1000 (D. Kan. 1989). “Furthermore, defendants argue that the state legislature contemplated anticompetitive regulation when it enacted the Zoning Enabling Act, K.S.A. 12-701 et seq. and the Kansas Redevelopment of Central Business District Areas Act, K.”
Colonial Inv. Co. v. City of Leawood, 646 P.2d 1149 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). “Kansas statutes regarding zoning are found at K.S.A. 12-701, et seq., for cities and joint committees of city and county planning boards, and at K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.