History:
L. 1909, ch. 74, § 5; L. 1913, ch. 85, § 2; R.S. 1923, § 13-1711; Repealed, L. 1968, ch. 274, § 50; April 30.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Section cited in considering proceedings for abandonment of commission government. Coney v. City of Topeka, 96 Kan. 46, 48, 149 P. 689.
2. Petition need not be all on one paper. State, ex rel., v. Dunn, 118 Kan. 184, 194, 235 P. 132.
3. Discussed; petition for election under K.S.A. 12-2001 need not be verified. State, ex rel., v. City of Walnut, 165 Kan. 205, 210, 211, 193 P.2d 712.
4. Considered in determining sufficiency of verification of signatures to street improvement protest. Graham v. Corporon, 196 Kan. 564, 570, 571, 413 P.2d 110.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1948–1987 · leading case: Unger v. Horn, 732 P.2d 1275 (Kan. 1987).
Unger v. Horn, 732 P.2d 1275 (Kan. 1987). · cites it 2דFor example, the General Statutes of 1949 § 13-1711 provided for recall of elective officers for first class cities.”
State ex rel. Griffith v. City of Walnut, 193 P.2d 172 (Kan. 1948). · cites it 2דSection 13-1711 is a statute providing the procedure for the removal of elective officers.”
Graham v. Corporon, 413 P.2d 110 (Kan. 1966). · cites it 2דSection 13-1711 is a statute providing the procedure for the removal of elective officers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.