Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 16a-3-201 (2026)

(UCCC) Consumer leases

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

16a-3-201. (UCCC) Consumer leases. A lessor shall disclose to the consumer the information required by rules and regulations adopted by the administrator pursuant to K.S.A. 16a-6-104, and amendments thereto.

History: L. 1973, ch. 85, § 41; L. 1992, ch. 46, § 2; L. 2024, ch. 6, § 61; January 1, 2025.

KANSAS COMMENT, 2010

1. The U3C covers only those leases which exceed four months in duration. See the Kansas comment to K.S.A. 16a-1-301(16). Note that potential liability at the end of the lease term is limited by K.S.A. 16a-3-401; see the Kansas comment to that section.

2. In 1976, Congress added the Consumer Leasing Act (CLA) to the TILA, 15 U.S.C. § 1667 et seq. The CLA contains its own requirements for disclosure in consumer leasing transactions, and inconsistent state law is preempted. See Federal Reserve Board Regulation M, 12 C.F.R. Part 213. As had earlier been done for consumer credit sales and loans, the administrator has adopted a regulation that incorporates the federal disclosure requirements for leases by reference. See K.A.R. 75-6-26. See also the Kansas comment to K.S.A. 16a-3-401.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Failure to include the term unpaid balance constitutes a violation of truth in lending. Ed Marling Stores, Inc. v. Miracle, 6 Kan. App. 2d 175, 185, 627 P.2d 352 (1981).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1981–1981 · leading case: Ed Marling Stores, Inc. v. Miracle, 627 P.2d 352 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ed Marling Stores, Inc. v. Miracle, 627 P.2d 352 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “We find that Kansas should follow the authority as set forth above, and we find that in these two cases the plaintiff failed to comply with K.S.A. 16a-3-201 et seq. Under the provisions of K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.