Notes of Decisions
Maurice Symonette v. V.A. Leasing Corp., 648 F. App'x 787 (11th Cir. 2016).
“” 15 U.S.C. § 1667 (1). Civil claims under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) must allege a “pattern of racketeering activity,” which requires at least two predicate acts of racketeering activities as defined by 18 U.”
Landry Dixon v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 794 F.3d 507 (5th Cir. 2015).
· cites it 4× “On January 6, 2014, Dixon filed another action against TMCC, bringing a claim under the Consumer Leasing Act (“CLA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667 -1667Í. After consolidating this new action with the existing one, the district court granted TMCC’s motion to dismiss on April 10, 2014.”
Jarvis v. South Oak Dodge, Inc., 773 N.E.2d 641 (Ill. 2002).
· cites it 2× “Among other things, a consumer lease must contain "[a]ll items required to be disclosed by the Consumer Leasing Act [ 15 U.S.C. § 1667 et seq. (2000)]." 815 ILCS 636/25(e)(1) (West 2000).”
Bescos v. Bank of Am., 105 Cal. App. 4th 378 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “) TILA, in turn, includes the federal Consumer Leasing Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 1667 et seq.), enacted in 1976 as an amendment to TILA because consumer leases were increasingly being used as an alternative to credit purchases.”
Joyce Jones v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 358 F.3d 205 (2d Cir. 2004).
“Channell involved a creditor’s counterclaims to collect debts in a class action alleging violations of the Consumer Leasing Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667 -1667e (2000). As Judge Easterbrook stated, “Now that Congress has codified the supplemental jurisdiction in § 1367(a), courts…”
Demitropoulos v. Bank One Milwaukee, N.A., 915 F. Supp. 1399 (N.D. Ill. 1996).
· cites it 3× “d/b/a Team Chevrolet and GEO (“Team Chevy”), alleging that Bank One’s standard automobile form lease violates the Consumer Leasing Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1667 et seq. (count I), and the Illinois and Wisconsin Consumer Fraud Acts (count II).”
Lyon v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., 656 F.3d 877 (9th Cir. 2011).
“§§ 1666 -1666j; the Consumer Leasing Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667 -1667f; the Credit Repair Organizations Act, 15 U.”
Silva v. Rent-A-Ctr., Inc., 912 N.E.2d 945 (Mass. 2009).
· cites it 4× “The language of the Massachusetts legislation clearly followed the model of the Federal Consumer Leasing Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667 -1667f (2006) (concerning personal property leases of more than four months).”
Wiskup v. Liberty Buick Co., 953 F. Supp. 958 (N.D. Ill. 1997).
· cites it 3× “Vehicle Leasing (UBVL) for their use of automobile lease forms that allegedly-violate the disclosure requirements of the Consumer Leasing Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1667 et seq. (CLA), and several state statutes, and impose unreasonable termination charges in violation of federal and…”
Valencia Carmichael v. Nissan Motor Acceptance, 291 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2002).
· cites it 2× “PER CURIAM: This is a case of first impression concerning the Consumer Leasing Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667 -1667Í (“CLA”). According to the language of the CLA, the one-year statute of limitations begins to run at “the termination of the lease agreement.”
Smith v. ABC Rental Sys. of New Orleans, Inc., 491 F. Supp. 127 (E.D. La. 1978).
· cites it 3× “, District Judge: In this suit plaintiff has urged alternative claims based on the Federal Consumer Leasing Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. § 1667 , and the Federal Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.”
David C. Turner v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 180 F.3d 451 (2d Cir. 1999).
· cites it 2× “(“GMAC”) violated the Consumer Leasing Act (“CLA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667 -1667f, the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), and New York’s General Obligations Law (“GOL”) by profiting from funds held as security deposits under auto leases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.