K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-101 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-101.

History: R.S. 1923, 21-101; Repealed, L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4701; July 1, 1970.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2026 · leading case: Evans v. City of Emporia, 243 P.3d 374 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Evans v. City of Emporia, 243 P.3d 374 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “Section 21-101(c) defines nonconforming use as “an existing use of a structure or land which does not comply with the use regulations application to new uses in the zoning district in which it is located.”
United States v. James Thomas York & Stephen Joseph York, 578 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1978). “Kan.Stat.Ann. §§ 21-101 and 21-102; Miss.”
MSW, INC. v. Marion Cnty. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 24 P.3d 175 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing following the provisions also outlined in Article 28 of these Regulations and shall review such development plan and statements and shall, after a careful study of the effect that such buildings, structures, or uses will have…”
Downing (D. Kan. 2026). “, K.S.A. 21-101, et seq.) could form the basis of a claim for attorneys’ fees under K.”
Collins v. State, 463 P.2d 1018 (Kan. 1970). · cites it 2× “Collins, although you have waived formal reading of the Information, the Court would inform you in count 1 of this Information filed by the State you are charged with the offense of attempted burglary in the 2nd degree in violation of Section 21-101 and 21-520 of the General…”
K.S.A. § 21-101(c): 1 case
Evans v. City of Emporia, 243 P.3d 374 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “Section 21-101(c) defines nonconforming use as “an existing use of a structure or land which does not comply with the use regulations application to new uses in the zoning district in which it is located.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.