History:
L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3207; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited; sufficiency of complaint based on theory of defendant's individual responsibility for corporate crime examined. State v. Jones, 242 Kan. 385, 394, 748 P.2d 839 (1988).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1972–1988 · leading case: State v. Jones, 748 P.2d 839 (Kan. 1988).
State v. Jones, 748 P.2d 839 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 22דThe purpose of the complaint is twofold: (1) to disclose sufficient factual information to enable a magistrate to make an intelligent and impartial finding that there is probable cause to believe that a specific crime has been committed by the defendant and (2) to inform the…”
State of Kansas v. Holeb, 196 N.W.2d 387 (Neb. 1972). “” K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 21-3207. Appellee contends that he committed no crime in Kansas.”
State v. Jones, 731 P.2d 881 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “K.S.A. 21-3207. Defendant admitted that JoCo owed Yamaha about $150,000 under the floor plan when it went out of business but denied any criminal intent to impair the security agreement.”
K.S.A. § 21-3207(1): 1 case
State v. Jones, 748 P.2d 839 (Kan. 1988). “The purpose of the complaint is twofold: (1) to disclose sufficient factual information to enable a magistrate to make an intelligent and impartial finding that there is probable cause to believe that a specific crime has been committed by the defendant and (2) to inform the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.