K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-3601 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3601.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3601; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 87; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 54; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1985–2012 · leading case: State v. Fitzgerald, 726 P.2d 1344 (Kan. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Fitzgerald, 726 P.2d 1344 (Kan. 1986). · cites it 5× “22-3602, upon a question reserved following the trial court’s discharge of the defendant in an action charging him with bigamy (K.S.A. 21-3601). The facts are not in dispute.”
State v. Szczygiel, 279 P.3d 700 (Kan. 2012). “We have jurisdiction under K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-3601(b)(3) (maximum sentence of life imprisonment imposed).”
Potter v. Murray City, 760 F.2d 1065 (10th Cir. 1985). “§ 18-6-201 (1978); Kan.Stat.Ann. § 21-3601 (1981); N.M.Stat.”
State v. Legg, 13 P.3d 355 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “See K.S.A. 21-3601. We conclude the trial court did not err in finding there was a factual basis to support each of the charges and Legg’s pleas.”
K.S.A. § 21-3601(b)(3): 1 case
State v. Szczygiel, 279 P.3d 700 (Kan. 2012). “We have jurisdiction under K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-3601(b)(3) (maximum sentence of life imprisonment imposed).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.