Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-3705 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3705.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3705; L. 1972, ch. 116, § 2; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 42; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 67; L. 1995, ch. 251, § 1; L. 1999, ch. 164, § 9; L. 2008, ch. 183, § 2; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases, 1974–2007 · leading case: State v. Anthony, 58 P.3d 742 (Kan. 2002).
State v. Anthony, 58 P.3d 742 (Kan. 2002). · cites it 7× “The court relied not only upon Millers determination of a lack of jurisdiction to modify under the KSGA, but also the absence of modification authority in K.S.A. 21-3705: “Further, the plain language of K.”
State v. Burnett, 607 P.2d 88 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 24× “) Defendant alleges on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the offense of unlawful deprivation of property, pursuant to K.S.A. 21-3705. Defendant Gerald Burnett was employed as assistant manager of Auto Parts of Holton, Inc.”
State v. McKissack, 156 P.3d 1249 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 5× “At that time this court held that the crime of unlawful deprivation of property under K.S.A. 21-3705 (Ensley 1981) was a lesser included offense of the crime of theft under K.”
State v. Keeler, 710 P.2d 1279 (Kan. 1985). · cites it 3× “Appellant’s other complaint about the instructions is the failure of the court to instruct upon the lesser included offense or lesser offense of unlawful deprivation of property, K.S.A. 21-3705. The statute provides in part: “Unlawful deprivation of property is obtaining or…”
State v. Long, 675 P.2d 832 (Kan. 1984). · cites it 2× “The crime of theft is covered in K.S.A. 21-3701.”
State v. Smith, 981 P.2d 1182 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 6× “Smith was convicted of criminal deprivation of a motor vehicle (K.S.A. 21-3705). The district court sentenced Smith to 12 months’ probation, with 30 days in jail as a condition of probation.”
State v. Greene, 623 P.2d 933 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 3× “After a joint trial, they were each convicted by a jury of two misdemeanors: unlawful deprivation of property under K.S.A. 21-3705, and failure to obey the lawful order of a police officer under K.”
Candi Ryder v. The City of Topeka & Michael Meyer, 814 F.2d 1412 (10th Cir. 1987). “21-3703; (2) unlawful deprivation of property — K.S.A. 21-3705; (3) theft, obtaining by deception control over property — K.”
State v. McGill, 22 P.3d 597 (Kan. 2001). “Then the panel held: “Further, the plain language of K.S.A. 21-3705 [the statute requires mandatory jail time increasing with each subsequent conviction] does not authorize the district court to modify a sentence but merely stated a defendant must serve the mandatory jail time…”
State v. Lashley, 664 P.2d 1358 (Kan. 1983). “21-3703; (2) unlawful deprivation of property — K.S.A. 21-3705; (3) theft, obtaining by deception control over property — K.”
State v. Holthaus, 564 P.2d 542 (Kan. 1977). · cites it 2× “21-3720 and K.S.A. 21-3705, respectively. The facts pertaining to the questions raised on appeal are not in serious dispute.”
Zimmer v. McKune, 87 F. Supp. 2d 1153 (D. Kan. 2000). · cites it 4× “§ 21-3426 and of criminal deprivation of property in violation of Kan.Stat. Ann. § 21-3705. The trial judge sentenced Martin to a term of forty-four months for robbery and a term of twelve months for criminal deprivation of property to run concurrently.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3705(a) — 5 cases
State v. McKissack, 156 P.3d 1249 (Kan. 2007). “At that time this court held that the crime of unlawful deprivation of property under K.S.A. 21-3705 (Ensley 1981) was a lesser included offense of the crime of theft under K.”
Thomas v. Benchmark Ins., 140 P.3d 438 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).
In Re Wright, 76 P.3d 1018 (Kan. 2003).
State v. Scott, 17 P.3d 966 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).
In Re Farrell, 21 P.3d 552 (Kan. 2001).
— K.S.A. § 21-3705(b) — 3 cases
State v. Anthony, 58 P.3d 742 (Kan. 2002). “The court relied not only upon Millers determination of a lack of jurisdiction to modify under the KSGA, but also the absence of modification authority in K.S.A. 21-3705: “Further, the plain language of K.”
State v. Smith, 981 P.2d 1182 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “Smith was convicted of criminal deprivation of a motor vehicle (K.S.A. 21-3705). The district court sentenced Smith to 12 months’ probation, with 30 days in jail as a condition of probation.”
State v. Anthony, 42 P.3d 207 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.