K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-3719 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3719.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3719; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 118; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 77; L. 1994, ch. 291, § 30; L. 2006, ch. 211, § 4; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2021 · leading case: State v. McCaslin, 245 P.3d 1030 (Kan. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. McCaslin, 245 P.3d 1030 (Kan. 2011). · cites it 2× “" K.S.A. 21-3719(a)(1). Similar to the murder conviction, McCaslin does not advance substantive arguments in his brief.”
State v. Kingsley, 851 P.2d 370 (Kan. 1993). · cites it 4× “21-3427; aggravated arson, K.S.A. 21-3719; and forgery, K-S.A. 21-3710(b).”
State v. Dixon, 112 P.3d 883 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 2× “" K.S.A. 21-3719. The jury was instructed on aggravated arson as follows in accordance with PIK Crim.”
State v. Houck, 727 P.2d 460 (Kan. 1986). · cites it 3× “21-3718(1)(a), K.S.A. 21-3719; two counts of conspiracy to commit aggravated arson, K.”
State v. Dickson, 69 P.3d 549 (Kan. 2003). · cites it 2× “21-3718(l)(a) and K.S.A. 21-3719. However, the evidence of the case was that defendant committed aggravated arson under a different section of the statute, K.”
State v. Dixon, 209 P.3d 675 (Kan. 2009). “21-3401; *50 aggravated arson, in violation of K.S.A. 21-3719; six counts of aggravated battery, in violation of K.”
State v. Davis, 802 P.2d 541 (Kan. 1990). · cites it 2× “21-3427), and aggravated arson (K.S.A. 21-3719). Davis contends that (1), because there is not sufficient evidence to support his conviction of the underlying felony of aggravated robbery by threat, which was not alleged in the information, his felony murder conviction is…”
State v. Kingsley, 326 P.3d 1083 (Kan. 2014). “21-3427 (Weeks 1988); aggravated arson, in violation of K.S.A. 21-3719 (Weeks 1988); and forgery, in violation of K.”
State v. Beechum, 833 P.2d 988 (Kan. 1992). · cites it 2× “Hamilton contended that the sentence should be set aside because the trial court failed to consider the alternatives set out in K.S.A. 21-4601 and 21-4603. Hamilton asserted that the SRDC was inclined to recommend probation and that the trial court abused its discretion by not…”
State v. Boone, 83 P.3d 195 (Kan. 2004). “) K.S.A. 21-3719(a). In amending the arson statute from “property of another person” to the present statute using the words “any interest,” our legislature intended to expand the types of property interest protected by the arson statute.”
State v. Duke, 887 P.2d 110 (Kan. 1994). “21-3718, K.S.A. 21-3719. Duke argues that because the jury instruction failed to include all essential elements of the offense, his convictions for felony murder and arson must be set aside.”
State v. Hamilton, 731 P.2d 863 (Kan. 1987). “: The appeals of Gene Hamilton from the sentence imposed upon him after a plea of guilty to one count of aggravated arson (K.S.A. 21-3719) in case No. 58,927, and from his convictions by a jury of aggravated robbery (K.”
Show all 32 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-3719(a) — 2 cases
State v. Boone, 83 P.3d 195 (Kan. 2004). “) K.S.A. 21-3719(a). In amending the arson statute from “property of another person” to the present statute using the words “any interest,” our legislature intended to expand the types of property interest protected by the arson statute.”
State v. Belt (Kan. 2016).
— K.S.A. § 21-3719(a)(1) — 1 case
State v. McCaslin, 245 P.3d 1030 (Kan. 2011). “" K.S.A. 21-3719(a)(1). Similar to the murder conviction, McCaslin does not advance substantive arguments in his brief.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3719(a)(l) — 1 case
State v. McCaslin, 245 P.3d 1030 (Kan. 2011). “" K.S.A. 21-3719(a)(1). Similar to the murder conviction, McCaslin does not advance substantive arguments in his brief.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3719(b)(1) — 1 case
State v. Belt (Kan. 2016).
— K.S.A. § 21-3719(b)(2) — 1 case
State v. Belt (Kan. 2016).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.