Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 21-3826 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
21-3826.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3826; L. 1970, ch. 127, § 1; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 58; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 117; L. 1997, ch. 179, § 2; L. 1997, ch. 179, § 3; L. 2009, ch. 88, § 1; L. 2009, ch. 143, § 10; L. 2010, ch. 147, § 4; Repealed, L. 2011, ch. 30, § 288; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1974–2024 · leading case: State v. Watson, 44 P.3d 357 (Kan. 2002).
State v. Watson, 44 P.3d 357 (Kan. 2002). “Watson challenges the constitutionality of K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-3826. She concedes the statute is constitutional as applied, but contends it is facially unconstitutional.”
State v. Cole, 710 P.2d 25 (Kan. 1985). “Appellee Steven Cole, an inmate in the Sedgwick County Jail, was charged with possession of a weapon without authorization or consent of the jailer in violation of K.S.A. 21-3826. A preliminary hearing was scheduled for January 7, 1985.”
State v. Ponce, 907 P.2d 876 (Kan. 1995). “: Jose Ponce was charged in Count I with possession of marijuana and in Count II with trafficking in contraband in a correctional institution (K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 21-3826), with the marijuana being the contraband.”
State v. Roseberry, 567 P.2d 883 (Kan. 1977). “Roseberry was charged under K.S.A. 21-3826 with feloniously introducing a drug, marihuana, into the Johnson county jail without the consent of the jailer.”
State v. Warren, 304 P.3d 1288 (Kan. 2013). ““The question we must address is whether a lesser, or departure, sentence can ever be granted based on the small quantity of drugs involved when sentencing a defendant for bringing contraband into a prison in violation of K.S.A. 21-3826. We review that question independently,…”
State v. Hinostroza, 552 P.3d 1202 (Kan. 2024). “At the bottom, again in larger letters, the sign warned: 4 "ANY PERSON BRINGING CONTRABAND PAST THIS POINT/ May be charged with K.S.A. 21-3826." K.S.A. 21-3826 was the trafficking contraband statute before a recodification caused the statute to be moved to its current location,…”
Pope v. Ransdell, 833 P.2d 965 (Kan. 1992). “21-3710); (2) a 1976 conviction for attempting to introduce a contraband substance, the drug Valium, into a penal institution (K.S.A. 21-3826); and (3) a 1982 conviction for obtaining a prescription-only drug by fraudulent means (K.”
State v. Brantley, 691 P.2d 26 (Kan. 1984). “The first count charged defendant with felony murder, claiming the homicide occurred during defendant’s possession of a weapon in a penal institution contrary to K.S.A. 21-3826, a class E felony. The second count charged defendant with a separate violation of K.”
State v. LaGrange, 279 P.3d 105 (Kan. 2012). “See K.S.A. 21-3826 (prohibiting trafficking in contraband in correctional institution); K.”
Shepherd v. Davies, 789 P.2d 1190 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). “44-12-901(a)(4), which incorporates K.S.A. 21-3826, defining “alcoholic liquor” or “intoxicating beverage” as contraband.”
State v. Perez-Moran, 80 P.3d 361 (Kan. 2003). “21-3413 to K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-3826(c)(2) and (d), which provides that traffic in contraband in a correctional facility carries a lesser crime severity level than the same act when committed by a correctional institution employee.”
State v. Harlin, 925 P.2d 1149 (Kan. 1996). “He was later charged in the Ellsworth County District Court with one *883 count, of solicitation to introduce contraband into a penal facility, a violation of K.S.A. 21-3826 and K.S.A. 21-3303, a level 9 nonperson felony, and one count of delivery of marijuana, a violation of K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3826(a) — 1 case
State v. Gallardo, 224 P.3d 1192 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
— K.S.A. § 21-3826(c)(1) — 1 case
State v. Taylor (Kan. Ct. App. 2017).
— K.S.A. § 21-3826(c)(2) — 1 case
State v. Perez-Moran, 80 P.3d 361 (Kan. 2003). “21-3413 to K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-3826(c)(2) and (d), which provides that traffic in contraband in a correctional facility carries a lesser crime severity level than the same act when committed by a correctional institution employee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.