Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4617 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4617.

History: L. 1973, ch. 339, § 73; L. 1976, ch. 161, § 2; Repealed, L. 1978, ch. 120, § 32; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1987–2012 · leading case: State v. Jaben, 277 P.3d 417 (Kan. 2012).
State v. Jaben, 277 P.3d 417 (Kan. 2012). · cites it 6× “Instead, the district court applied the statute in effect at the time Jaben committed his crimes of conviction, K.S.A. 21-4617 (Weeks), which permitted expungement of Jaben’s convictions.”
State v. Anderson, 744 P.2d 143 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “. may petition the court five (5) years after the .”
In re O'Neill, 172 P.3d 1179 (Kan. 2007). “21-4616 (Weeks) or K.S.A. 21-4617(b) (Weeks), either of which provided that, upon annulment, the offender “shall in all respects be treated as not having been convicted,” except for determining sentence in the event of a subsequent conviction, and that “[i]n any application for…”
State v. Sandstrom, 44 P.3d 434 (Kan. 2002). “” APPLICABLE STATUTE The parties have stipulated that the applicable form of the expungement statute is K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 21-4617, which provides: “Every offender who was twenty-one (21) years of age or older at the time of the commission of the crime for which he or she was…”
K.S.A. § 21-4617(a): 2 cases
State v. Jaben, 277 P.3d 417 (Kan. 2012). “Instead, the district court applied the statute in effect at the time Jaben committed his crimes of conviction, K.S.A. 21-4617 (Weeks), which permitted expungement of Jaben’s convictions.”
State v. Anderson, 744 P.2d 143 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “. may petition the court five (5) years after the .”
K.S.A. § 21-4617(b): 1 case
In re O'Neill, 172 P.3d 1179 (Kan. 2007). “21-4616 (Weeks) or K.S.A. 21-4617(b) (Weeks), either of which provided that, upon annulment, the offender “shall in all respects be treated as not having been convicted,” except for determining sentence in the event of a subsequent conviction, and that “[i]n any application for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.