K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4621 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4621.

History: L. 1980, ch. 104, § 5; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2013 · leading case: Cansler v. State, 675 P.2d 57 (Kan. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cansler v. State, 675 P.2d 57 (Kan. 1984). “21-4620, which authorizes the sentencing of defendants to the custody of the secretary of corrections; and K.S.A. 21-4621, which provides for a commitment order, committing the defendant to the custody of the secretary of corrections.”
State v. J.H., 197 P.3d 467 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007). “provides: “When it appears that a person convicted as an extended jurisdiction juvenile has violated the conditions of the juvenile sentence or is alleged to have committed a new offense, the court, without notice, may revoke the stay and probation and direct that the juvenile…”
State v. J.D.H., 294 P.3d 343 (Kan. Ct. App. 2013). “it appears that a person sentenced as an extended jurisdiction juvenile has violated one or more conditions of the juvenile sentence or is alleged to have committed a new offense, the court, without notice, may revoke the stay and juvenile sentence and direct that the juvenile…”
State v. Anthony, 42 P.3d 207 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “If the presumptive sentence is imprisonment, the felon is transferred to die custody of the Secretary of Corrections, K.S.A. 21-4621, and good time credits are earned or forfeited pursuant to rules promulgated by the Secretary.”
State v. JH, 197 P.3d 467 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007). “(b)) provides: "When it appears that a person convicted as an extended jurisdiction juvenile has violated the conditions of the juvenile sentence or is alleged to have committed a new offense, the court, without notice, may revoke the stay and probation and direct that the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.