K.S.A. » Chapter 22
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 22-2729 (2026)

Uniformity of interpretation

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

22-2729. Uniformity of interpretation. The provisions of this act* shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate its general purposes to make uniform the law of those states which enact it.

History: L. 1970, ch. 129, § 22-2729; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–1993 · leading case: Kennon v. State, 809 P.2d 546 (Kan. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kennon v. State, 809 P.2d 546 (Kan. 1991). “K.S.A. 22-2729 provides: “Uniformity of interpretation.”
Dunn v. Hindman, 836 F. Supp. 750 (D. Kan. 1993). “Petitioner contends that because Kansas did not adopt the Commissioner’s note into K.S.A. 22-2705, the note should be ignored and her expansive construction of the definition of leaving the state involuntarily or under compulsion should be accepted.”
Dunn v. Hindman, 855 P.2d 994 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). “K.S.A. 22-2729 directs that the provisions of the Kansas Uniform Criminal Extradition Act “shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate its general purposes to make uniform the law of those states which enact it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.