22-3217.
Pretrial conference.
At any time after the filing of the indictment or information the court upon motion of any party or upon its own motion may order one or more conferences to consider such matters as will promote a fair and expeditious trial. At the conclusion of a conference the court shall prepare and file a memorandum of the matters agreed upon. No admissions made by the defendant or his attorney at the conference shall be used against the defendant unless the admissions are reduced to writing and signed by the defendant and his attorney. This section shall not be invoked in the case of a defendant who is not represented by counsel.
History:
L. 1970, ch. 129, § 22-3217; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
9
cases, 1979–2015 · leading case:
State v. Bright, 623 P.2d 917 (Kan. 1981).
State v. Bright, 623 P.2d 917 (Kan. 1981).
· cites it 2× “Our statute, K.S.A. 22-3217, is based on Rule 17.1, F.”
State v. Coleman, 856 P.2d 121 (Kan. 1993).
· cites it 2× “22-3218, defense counsel has no reciprocal statutory requirement to. disclose the names of defense witnesses prior to trial.”
State v. Bloom, 44 P.3d 305 (Kan. 2002).
“2d 1108 (1979) (disapproved on other grounds); see K.S.A. 22-3217; K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 60-216.”
State v. Quick, 597 P.2d 1108 (Kan. 1979).
“See K.S.A. 22-3217 and K.S.A. 60-216. The Kansas Code of Civil Procedure was patterned after the federal rules.”
State v. Hardy, 347 P.3d 222 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “See K.S.A. 22-3217 (authorizing district court to hold pretrial conferences as may be necessary to “promote a fair and expeditious trial”); State v.”
State v. Crume, 22 P.3d 1057 (Kan. 2001).
“See K.S.A. 22-3217 and K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 60-216.”
State v. Crow, 974 P.2d 100 (Kan. 1999).
“” K.S.A. 22-3217. These are all matters of pretrial procedure in a criminal case, and we see no valid constitutional reason why utilizing K.”
State v. Cummings, 744 P.2d 858 (Kan. 1987).
“The first issue is whether the trial court denied Cummings’ due process and Sixth Amendment right to call witnesses on his behalf by refusing to allow J. D. Burns to testify. At the pretrial conference, Cummings did not inform the State he intended to call Burns as a witness,…”
State v. Allen, 131 P.3d 1241 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).
“I do find that section that I just cited, that aggravated incest as adjudicated in juvenile court does comprise a sexually violent crime under K.S.A. 22-3217, and as such, the persistent sexual offender status relied upon in tire PSI is appropriate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.