K.S.A. » Chapter 24
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 24-105 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

24-105.

History: L. 1911, ch. 175, § 1; L. 1917, ch. 176, § 1; R.S. 1923, 24-105; L. 1931, ch. 184, § 1; L. 1951, ch. 261, § 1; Repealed, L. 2013, ch. 111, § 10; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1951–2003 · leading case: Williamson v. City of Hays, 64 P.3d 364 (Kan. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Williamson v. City of Hays, 64 P.3d 364 (Kan. 2003). · cites it 15× “The enactment of tire statutory forerunners to K.S.A. 24-105 and 24-106 modified the common law.”
Clawson v. Garrison, 592 P.2d 117 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 10× “To consider these we first note applicable underlying law.”
State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Mills, 233 P.2d 720 (Kan. 1951). · cites it 8× “As to the second question, plaintiff seeks to avoid this statement contained in section 24-105, “but nothing herein shall be construed as preventing an owner of land from constructing a dike or levee along the bank of a natural watercourse to repel floodwaters from such natural…”
Dougan v. Rossville Drainage Dist., 757 P.2d 272 (Kan. 1988). “24-105 now provides in part: “It shall be unlawful for a landowner or proprietor to construct or maintain a dam or levee which has the effect of obstructing or collecting and discharging with increased force and volume the flow of surface water to the damage of the adjacent…”
DeWerff v. Schartz, 751 P.2d 1047 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “The enactment of the statutory forerunners to K.S.A. 24-105 and 24-106 modified the common law.”
Horn v. Seeger, 255 P.2d 1000 (Kan. 1953). · cites it 2× “The Court concludes as a matter of law that the Statute, Section 24-105, General Statutes of Kansas for 1949, does not authorize said engineer to approve plans for a levee that would block natural drainage and repel water therefrom, or block and repel surface waters from an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.