K.S.A. » Chapter 26
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 26-516 (2026)

Same; citation of act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

26-516. Same; citation of act. This act may be cited as the "eminent domain procedure act."

History: L. 1963, ch. 234, § 16; January 1, 1964.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Mentioned in upholding eminent domain proceeding by telephone company; injunctive relief denied. Schuck v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 286 Kan. 7, 28, 180 P.3d 571 (2008).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2008–2012 · leading case: Schuck v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., Inc., 180 P.3d 571 (Kan. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Schuck v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., Inc., 180 P.3d 571 (Kan. 2008). “Under the facts presented here, however, the district court’s determination that Rural Telephone has the power of eminent domain and that the taking was necessary to its lawful corporate purposes is sound.”
Woods v. Unified Gov't of wyco/kck, 275 P.3d 46 (Kan. 2012). “See K.S.A. 26-516 (naming the Act). Specifically, Woods *295 points to K.”
Miller v. Fw Com. Props., LLC, 272 P.3d 596 (Kan. 2012). “See K.S.A. 26-516. *1103 “The Act provides for bifurcated proceedings in determining compensation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.