Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1682 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1682.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 113; L. 1983, ch. 140, § 41; L. 1996, ch. 229, § 94; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 169, § 140; January 1, 2007.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1984–2000 · leading case: Findlay v. State, 681 P.2d 20 (Kan. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Findlay v. State, 681 P.2d 20 (Kan. 1984). “” K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 38-1681 permits an appeal by the respondent from an order authorizing prosecution as an adult only after conviction unless the order attaches to future acts.”

McIntyre v. A.L. Abercrombie, Inc., 929 P.2d 1386 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “The Supreme Court recently applied the method of computing time set forth in 60-206(a) to the time limit established in K.S.A. 38-1682 for the prosecution to file an appeal in a juvenile pro *207 ceeding.”

Bain v. Cormack Enter., Inc., 986 P.2d 373 (Kan. 1999). “The governing statute, K.S.A. 38-1682, provided that such appeal shall be taken within 10 days after the entry of the order appealed from but did not provide a method for computing the 10-day requirement.”

In re J.D.B., 915 P.2d 69 (Kan. 1996). · cites it 3× “order dismissing proceedings when jeopardy has not attached, from an order denying authorization to *875 prosecute a respondent as an adult or upon a question reserved by the prosecution.”

In re R.L.C., 978 P.2d 285 (Kan. 1999). · cites it 5× “22-3603, K.S.A. 38-1682, and K.S.A. [1998 Supp.] 38-1683.”

In re D.G.K., 995 P.2d 413 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1682. The State did not reserve the issue of sanctions for this appeal.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.