K.S.A. » Chapter 40
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 40-2002 (2026)

Commissioner as process agent for unauthorized insurer; service of process

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

40-2002. Commissioner as process agent for unauthorized insurer; service of process. (a) Any of the following acts in this state, effected by mail or otherwise, by an unauthorized foreign or alien insurer: (1) The issuance or delivery of contracts of insurance to residents of this state or to corporations authorized to do business therein; (2) the solicitation of applications for such contracts; (3) the collection of premiums, membership fees, assessments or other considerations for such contracts; or (4) any other transaction of insurance business, is equivalent to and shall constitute an appointment by such insurer of the commissioner of insurance and his successor or successors in office, to be its true and lawful attorney, upon whom may be served all lawful process in any action, suit, or proceeding instituted by or on behalf of an insured or beneficiary arising out of any such contract of insurance, and any such act shall be signification of its agreement that such service of process is of the same legal force and validity as personal service of process in this state upon such insurer.

(b) Such service of process shall be made by delivering to and leaving with the commissioner of insurance or some person in apparent charge of his office two copies thereof and the payment to him of such fees as may be prescribed by law. The commissioner of insurance shall forthwith mail by registered mail one of the copies of such process to the defendant at its last known principal place of business, and shall keep a record of all process so served upon him. Such service of process is sufficient, provided notice of such service and a copy of the process are sent within ten days thereafter by registered mail by plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney to the defendant at its last known principal place of business, and the defendant's receipt, or receipt issued by the post office with which the letter is registered; showing the name of the sender of the letter and the name and address of the person to whom the letter is addressed, and the affidavit of the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney showing a compliance herewith are filed with the clerk of the court in which such action is pending on or before the date the defendant is required to appear, or within such further time as the court may allow.

(c) Service of process in any such action, suit or proceeding shall in addition to the manner provided in subsection (b) of this section be valid if served upon any person within the state who, in this state on behalf of such insurer, is

(1) soliciting insurance, or

(2) making, issuing or delivering any contract of insurance, or

(3) collecting or receiving any premium, membership fee, assessment or other consideration for insurance; and a copy of such process is sent within ten days thereafter by registered mail by the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney to the defendant at the last known principal place of business of the defendant, and the defendant's receipt, or the receipt issued by the post office with which the letter is registered, showing the name of the sender of the letter and the name and address of the person to whom the letter is addressed, and the affidavit of the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney showing a compliance herewith are filed with the clerk of the court in which such action is pending on or before the date the defendant is required to appear, or within such further time as the court may allow.

(d) No plaintiff or complainant shall be entitled to a judgment by default under this section until the expiration of thirty days from the date of the filing of the affidavit of compliance.

(e) Nothing in this section contained shall limit or abridge the right to serve any process, notice or demand upon any insurer in any other manner now or hereafter permitted by law.

History: L. 1949, ch. 283, § 2; June 30.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1957–2025 · leading case: Stephenson v. Frizzell Int'l, Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 1132 (D. Kan. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stephenson v. Frizzell Int'l, Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 1132 (D. Kan. 1993). · cites it 7× “K.S.A. 40-2002(a). Defendant contends that it is not an “insurer” as contemplated by the Unauthorized Insurers Process Act.”
Nicklin v. Harper, 860 P.2d 31 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). “” It appears the legislature intended the word unauthorized to modify the phrase foreign or alien insurer throughout the entire Act. If we disregard the comma between unauthorized and foreign in K.”
In re Berry v. DeWald garnishment (D. Kan. 2025). · cites it 18× “The Commissioner’s original proof of service filed in the state court, however, states that service was made on Princeton pursuant to K.S.A. § 40-2002; and the instructions served on Princeton included a 14-day deadline, not the 40-day deadline that would apply in the case of…”
Groff v. Auto. Owners Saf. Ins., 306 P.2d 130 (Kan. 1957). · cites it 2× “) Section 40-2002 provides, in part, that service of process may be had on any insurer committing any of the following acts in this state, effected by mail or otherwise, by an unauthorized foreign or alien insurer: (1) The issuance or delivery of contracts of insurance to…”
— K.S.A. § 40-2002(a) — 3 cases
Nicklin v. Harper, 860 P.2d 31 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). “” It appears the legislature intended the word unauthorized to modify the phrase foreign or alien insurer throughout the entire Act. If we disregard the comma between unauthorized and foreign in K.”
Stephenson v. Frizzell Int'l, Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 1132 (D. Kan. 1993). “K.S.A. 40-2002(a). Defendant contends that it is not an “insurer” as contemplated by the Unauthorized Insurers Process Act.”
In re Berry v. DeWald garnishment (D. Kan. 2025). “The Commissioner’s original proof of service filed in the state court, however, states that service was made on Princeton pursuant to K.S.A. § 40-2002; and the instructions served on Princeton included a 14-day deadline, not the 40-day deadline that would apply in the case of…”
— K.S.A. § 40-2002(b) — 2 cases
Stephenson v. Frizzell Int'l, Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 1132 (D. Kan. 1993). “K.S.A. 40-2002(a). Defendant contends that it is not an “insurer” as contemplated by the Unauthorized Insurers Process Act.”
In re Berry v. DeWald garnishment (D. Kan. 2025). “The Commissioner’s original proof of service filed in the state court, however, states that service was made on Princeton pursuant to K.S.A. § 40-2002; and the instructions served on Princeton included a 14-day deadline, not the 40-day deadline that would apply in the case of…”
— K.S.A. § 40-2002(d) — 1 case
In re Berry v. DeWald garnishment (D. Kan. 2025). “The Commissioner’s original proof of service filed in the state court, however, states that service was made on Princeton pursuant to K.S.A. § 40-2002; and the instructions served on Princeton included a 14-day deadline, not the 40-day deadline that would apply in the case of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.