K.S.A. » Chapter 05
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 5-411 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

5-411.

History: L. 1973, ch. 24, § 11; Repealed, L. 2018, ch. 90, § 35; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Arbitration award upheld in state building construction controversy; no evidence that award obtained by fraud, corruption or undue means. Evans Electrical Constr. Co. v. University of Kansas Med. Center, 230 Kan. 298, 305, 634 P.2d 1079 (1981).

2. Cited in action filed in district court to confirm arbitration award. In re Arbitration between Johns Constr. Co. & U.S.D. No. 210, 233 Kan. 527, 644 P.2d 821 (1983).

3. Review of arbitration award governed by act; open meetings act (K.S.A. 75-4317 et seq.) not applicable to contract dispute arbitration hearings on school construction. In re Arbitration between Johns Constr. Co. & U.S.D. No. 210, 233 Kan. 527, 528, 664 P.2d 821 (1983).

4. Cited; arbitration venue, award for improper equipment seizure, res judicata of earlier court decision, tort v. contract examined. Jackson Trak Group, Inc. v. Mid States Port Authority, 242 Kan. 683, 687, 751 P.2d 122 (1988).

5. Purpose of UAA as enforcing arbitration agreements as matter of public policy without resort to courts stated. City of Lenexa v. C.L. Fairley Constr. Co., 245 Kan. 316, 318, 777 P.2d 851 (1989).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1983–2012 · leading case: Jackson Trak Grp., Inc. Ex Rel. Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Mid States Port Auth., 751 P.2d 122 (Kan. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jackson Trak Grp., Inc. Ex Rel. Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Mid States Port Auth., 751 P.2d 122 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 2× “” Jackson Trak sought confirmation of the arbitration award in Sedgwick County District Court pursuant to K.S.A. 5-411 of the Kansas Uniform Arbitration Act.”
MBNA Am. Bank, N.A. v. Christianson, 659 S.E.2d 209 (S.C. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 15-48-20 (proceedings to compel or stay arbitration); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 5-411 & S.C.Code Ann. § 15-48-120 (confirmation of an award); Kan.”
City of Lenexa v. C. L. Fairley Constr. Co., 777 P.2d 851 (Kan. 1989). “K.S.A. 5-411. Thereafter, Lenexa filed a motion to vacate the award.”
Heartland Premier, Ltd. v. Grp. B & B, L.L.C., 31 P.3d 978 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “grounds are urged for vacating or modifying or correcting the award, in which case the court shall proceed as provided in K.S.A. 5-412 and 5-413.” K.”
Est. of Guido v. Exempla, Inc., 292 P.3d 996 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). “13 (2011); Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 5-411 to -413 (2011); Ky.”
In re the Arbitration Between Johns Constr. Co. & Unified Sch. Dist. No. 210, 664 P.2d 821 (Kan. 1983). “” In accordance with the agreement, the controversy was submitted to a panel of three arbitrators which determined the claims between the parties. The arbitrators found some items of dispute in favor of the contractor and other items in favor of the school district.”
Prof'l Builders, Inc. v. Sedan Floral, Inc., 819 P.2d 1254 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to K.S.A. 5-411, on November 7, 1990, PBI filed an application for an order confirming the arbitration award in the district court of Montgomery County, Kansas.”
Kopp v. Kopp, 239 P.3d 878 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “Here, Earl moved to vacate the award, so we turn to K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.