K.S.A. » Chapter 50
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 50-108 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

50-108.

History: L. 1897, ch. 265, § 8; R.S. 1923, 50-108; L. 1985, ch. 181, § 2; L. 2000, ch. 136, § 7; Repealed, L. 2013, ch. 102, § 7; April 18.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1983–2019 · leading case: O'Brien v. Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc., 277 P.3d 1062 (Kan. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
O'Brien v. Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc., 277 P.3d 1062 (Kan. 2012). · cites it 7× “50-112, entitling her and other class members to recovery under K.S.A. 50-108, K.S.A. 50-115, K.S.A. 50-147, and K.”
In re Wyoming Tight Sands Antitrust Cases, 128 F.R.D. 121 (D. Kan. 1989). · cites it 4× “eduction of its purchases from Hugoton decreased KPL’s allowable Hugoton purchases; (c) KPL’s claims, contained in paragraph 144 of KPL’s Third Amended Complaint, for intentional interference with KPL’s Hugoton contracts and its business expectations and opportunities with…”
Jahnke v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., 353 P.3d 455 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015). “60-3320 to 3330 (1983); Restraint of Trade Statutes, K.S.A. 50-108, -115, -137 (1983); Kansas Consumer Protection Act, K.”
Earth Scientists v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 619 F. Supp. 1465 (D. Kan. 1985). “, Open Records Act, K.S.A. 45-222 (Supp.1984); Public Meetings Act, K.”
Classic Commc'ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 956 F. Supp. 896 (D. Kan. 1996). · cites it 2× “Finally, Classic seeks recovery of attorneys’ fees under Kan.Stat.Ann. § 50-108, which applies to claims brought pursuant to the Kansas Antitrust Act.”
Amundson & Assocs. Art Studio, Ltd. v. Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins., 988 P.2d 1208 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “See K.S.A. 50-108, 50-115, and 50-801(b). Amundson contends that NCCI conspired to control the cost or rates of workers compensation insurance by fixing the fees paid to NCCI’s servicing carriers at levels far in excess of those that would exist under a competitive system.”
City of Chanute v. Kansas Gas & Elec. Co., 564 F. Supp. 1416 (D. Kan. 1983). · cites it 2× “§ 15 and K.S.A. §§ 50-108, 50-115. The matter is presently before the court on cities’ motion for preliminary injunction pursuant to 15 U.”
Cease v. Safelite Glass Corp., 927 F. Supp. 1452 (D. Kan. 1996). “Similarly, K.S.A. 50-108 4 (creating civil cause of action for violation of K.”
Reorganized FLI, Inc. v. The Williams Companies, Inc. (D. Kan. 2019). · cites it 2× “, “[f]or persons injured or damaged by price-fixing prohibited under K.S.A. 50-101 and K.S.A. 50-112, recovery of damages sustained, full consideration damages, and treble damages are permitted.”
Reorganized FLI, Inc. v. The Williams Companies, Inc. (D. Kan. 2019). · cites it 2× “addition, Plaintiff stated that it sought the necessary costs for bringing suit and reasonable attorney fees under § 50-108 and § 50-161.24 Under notice pleading standards, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint did not provide any notice to Defendants that Plaintiff sought anything…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.