Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 58-215 (2026)

Voluntary delivery of property as abandonment of lien; waiver by special contract

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

58-215. Voluntary delivery of property as abandonment of lien; waiver by special contract. The voluntary delivery to the owner or claimant of any personal property by any person claiming a lien thereon, as provided in this act, shall be held to be an abandonment of such lien, and such lien may also be waived by special contract.

History: G.S. 1868, ch. 58, § 10; L. 1872, ch. 142, § 10; March 21; R.S. 1923, 58-215.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Indicates possession is essential to lien. Loader v. Bank, 113 Kan. 718, 719, 216 P. 264.

2. Lien lost by surrendering cattle to owner. Hoy v. Griffin, 137 Kan. 872, 875, 22 P.2d 449.

3. Agister's lien claimed under K.S.A. 58-207; abandoned by voluntary surrender of horses. Chasteen v. Childers, 218 Kan. 519, 524, 525, 546 P.2d 935.

4. Lien waived; failure to file lien statement; possession of race car voluntarily surrendered. Weatherhead v. Boettcher, 3 Kan. App. 2d 261, 262, 594 P.2d 257.

5. Basic legal principles of personal property liens reviewed; common-law requirement of possession still overriding consideration. Northeast Kansas Prod. Cred. Ass'n v. Ferbache, 236 Kan. 491, 494, 693 P.2d 1152 (1985).

6. Violation of consumer protection act (K.S.A. 50-623 et seq.) held not to defeat a valid mechanic's lien; question of holding vehicle until repairs paid examined. Farrell v. General Motors Corp., 249 Kan. 231, 246, 815 P.2d 538 (1991).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1985–1991 · leading case: Farrell v. Gen. Motors Corp., 815 P.2d 538 (Kan. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Farrell v. Gen. Motors Corp., 815 P.2d 538 (Kan. 1991). “58-201 goes on to provide that “such lien shall be valid as long as the lien claimant retains possession of the property, and the claimant of the lien may retain the same after parting with the possession of the property by filing within 90 days in the office of the register of…”
Ne. Kansas Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Ferbrache, 693 P.2d 1152 (Kan. 1985). · cites it 2× “47-836 in 1969, a veterinarian *494 had no separate lien provided for by statute, and any claim of lien by a veterinarian had to be asserted under one of the statutory liens.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.