Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 58-2213 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

58-2213.

History: G.S. 1868, ch. 22, § 11; R.S. 1923, 67-213; Repealed, L. 1984, ch. 201, § 17; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Acknowledgment examined and held sufficient. Munger v. Baldridge, 41 Kan. 236, 242, 21 P. 159. Questioned: Nagle v. Tieperman, 74 Kan. 32, 42, 85 P. 941, 88 P. 969.

2. Certificate only prima facie evidence; notary competent witness. Heaton v. Bank, 59 Kan. 281, 288, 52 P. 876.

3. Liability of notary for damages; false statement in acknowledgment of deed. Bellport v. Harkins, 104 Kan. 543, 545, 180 P. 220.

4. Substance of these requirements is all that is essential. Mathewson, Administrator, v. Richards, 114 Kan. 500, 503, 220 P. 185.


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1978–1978 · leading case: Luthi v. Evans, 576 P.2d 1064 (Kan. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Luthi v. Evans, 576 P.2d 1064 (Kan. 1978). “K.S.A. 58-2213 through 58-2217 provide for the certification of acknowledgments and the procedure for proving an unacknowledged deed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.