K.S.A. § 58a-101

Citation of act

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

58a-101. Citation of act. This act may be cited as the Kansas uniform trust code.

History: L. 2002, ch. 133, § 1; January 1, 2003.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: In Re Harris Testamentary Trust
In Re Harris Testamentary Trust (2003) kan · cites it 2× “See Kansas Uniform Trust Code, K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 58a-101 et seq. (KUTC).”
In Re the Trust of Hildebrandt (2017) kanctapp “” “Material purpose” is not defined in the Kansas Uniform Trust Act, K.S.A. 58a-101 etseq. “[A] proposed modification might change the trustee or create a simple, inexpensive procedure for appointing successor trustees-, or it might create or change procedures for removing and…”
Wade Harvey, Ex Rel. Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust And Investment Company (2017) tenn “1303 (2017); Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 58a-101 to 58a-1107 (2012); Ky.”
McGinley v. Bank of America, N.A. (2005) kan “, the Uniform Trustees’ Powers Act, was repealed and replaced by the Kansas Uniform Trust Code (KUTC), K.S.A. 2003 Supp. 58a-101 et seq. McGinley filed suit just 2 days later.”
Estate of Somers v. Firstar Bank (2004) kan “Thus, the question is whether a court can terminate a spendthrift trust at the request of the beneficiaries, who are all in agreement and competent to consent, if the settlor is not available to consent to the termination.”
Roenne v. Miller (2020) kanctapp “The Kansas Uniform Trust Code, found in K.S.A. 58a-101 et seq., imposes those duties on trustees.”
In Re Trust D Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Darby (2010) kan “Overview of Applicable Statutes As statutory authority for the proposed modifications, Alford urges us to consider — and the district court relied upon — the following statutes within the Kansas Uniform Trust Code, K.S.A. 58a-101 et seq. K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 58a-411(b) and (c):…”
Godley v. Valley View State Bank (2004) kan “We decline because we agree with defendants that the KUTC’s possible application was not raised in this case until the plaintiffs’ response brief was filed on November 13, 2003.”
Matson v. Kansas Department of Corrections (2015) kan “After becoming dissatisfied with the management of the inmate trust fund, Matson filed this pro se suit in Leavenworth District Court pursuant to the Kansas Uniform Trust Code (KUTC), codified at K.S.A. 58a-101 et seq. He would eventually name as defendants the State of Kansas,…”
Case v. Hilgers Ex Rel. Blanche A. Hilgers Trust (In Re Hilgers) (2006) ksb · cites it 2× “in order the two primary issues presented: (1) whether the spendthrift provisions protect Phillip’s one-fourth remainder interest in the trust corpus from the claims of creditors and the bankruptcy trustee; and (2) whether the Trusts terminated by their terms and whether the…”
Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Bolander (2007) kanctapp “Commerce claimed the Estate was insolvent and that under the Kansas Uniform Trust Code, K.S.A. 58a-101 et seq., it was entitled to judgment against the Estate and the Trust, jointly and severally, for the full amount of the indebtedness regardless of any spendthrift clause.”
Rodriquez-Tocker v. Estate of Tocker (2006) kanctapp “The court found “inherent conflicts of interest” associated with Dariyl’s various roles and determined he had failed to comply with the duties imposed by both the Uniform Trust Code, K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 58a-101 et seq., and the Kansas Probate Code, K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.