Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 59-29a07 (2026)

Determination that person is a sexually violent predator; appeal; commitment procedure; interagency agreements; mistrials; persons committed and later taken into custody after parole, arrest or conviction, procedure; persons found incompetent to stand trial, procedure

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

59-29a07. Determination that person is a sexually violent predator; appeal; commitment procedure; interagency agreements; mistrials; persons committed and later taken into custody after parole, arrest or conviction, procedure; persons found incompetent to stand trial, procedure. (a) The court or jury shall determine whether, beyond a reasonable doubt, the person is a sexually violent predator. If such determination that the person is a sexually violent predator is made by a jury, such determination shall be by unanimous verdict of such jury. Such determination may be appealed in the manner provided for civil cases in article 21 of chapter 60 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated, and amendments thereto. If the court or jury determines that the person is a sexually violent predator, the person shall be committed to the custody of the secretary for aging and disability services for control, care and treatment until such time as the person's mental abnormality or personality disorder has so changed that the person is safe to be at large. Such control, care and treatment shall be provided at a facility operated by the Kansas department for aging and disability services.

(b) At all times, persons committed for control, care and treatment by the Kansas department for aging and disability services pursuant to the Kansas sexually violent predator act shall be kept in a secure facility and such persons shall be segregated on different units from any other patient under the supervision of the secretary for aging and disability services and commencing June 1, 1995, such persons committed pursuant to the Kansas sexually violent predator act shall be kept in a facility or building separate from any other patient under the supervision of the secretary. The secure confinement restriction shall not apply to any reintegration, transitional release or conditional release facility or building.

(c) The Kansas department for aging and disability services is authorized to enter into an interagency agreement with the department of corrections for the confinement of such persons. Such persons who are in the confinement of the secretary of corrections pursuant to an interagency agreement shall be housed and managed separately from offenders in the custody of the secretary of corrections, and except for occasional instances of supervised incidental contact, shall be segregated from such offenders.

(d) If any person while committed to the custody of the secretary pursuant to the Kansas sexually violent predator act shall be taken into custody by any law enforcement officer as defined in K.S.A. 21-5111, and amendments thereto, pursuant to any parole revocation proceeding or any arrest or conviction for a criminal offense of any nature, upon the person's release from the custody of any law enforcement officer, the person shall be returned to the custody of the secretary for further treatment pursuant to the Kansas sexually violent predator act. During any such period of time a person is not in the actual custody or supervision of the secretary, the secretary shall be excused from the provisions of K.S.A. 59-29a08, and amendments thereto, with regard to providing that person an annual examination, annual notice and annual report to the court, except that the secretary shall give notice to the court as soon as reasonably possible after the taking of the person into custody that the person is no longer in treatment pursuant to the Kansas sexually violent predator act and notice to the court when the person is returned to the custody of the secretary for further treatment.

(e) If the court or jury is not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the person is a sexually violent predator, the court shall direct the person's release.

(f) Upon a mistrial, the court shall direct that the person be held at an appropriate secure facility, including, but not limited to, a county jail, until another trial is conducted. Any subsequent trial following a mistrial shall be held within 90 days of the previous trial, unless such subsequent trial is continued as provided in K.S.A. 59-29a06, and amendments thereto.

(g) If the person charged with a sexually violent offense has been found incompetent to stand trial and is about to be released pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3305, and amendments thereto, and such person's commitment is sought pursuant to subsection (a), the court shall first hear evidence and determine whether the person did commit the act or acts charged. The hearing on this issue must comply with all the procedures specified in this section. In addition, the rules of evidence applicable in criminal cases shall apply and all constitutional rights available to defendants at criminal trials, other than the right not to be tried while incompetent, shall apply. After hearing evidence on this issue, the court shall make specific findings on whether the person did commit the act or acts charged, the extent to which the person's incompetence or developmental disability affected the outcome of the hearing, including its effect on the person's ability to consult with and assist counsel and to testify on such person's own behalf, the extent to which the evidence could be reconstructed without the assistance of the person and the strength of the prosecution's case. If after the conclusion of the hearing on this issue, the court finds, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the person did commit the act or acts charged, the court shall enter a final order, appealable by the person, on that issue and may proceed to consider whether the person should be committed pursuant to this section.

History: L. 1994, ch. 316, § 7; L. 1995, ch. 193, § 6; L. 1999, ch. 140, § 5; L. 2003, ch. 152, § 4; L. 2006, ch. 214, § 12; L. 2011, ch. 30, § 211; L. 2014, ch. 115, § 215; L. 2015, ch. 95, § 7; L. 2018, ch. 94, § 2; July 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 52 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case: State v. Thomas, 415 P.3d 430 (Kan. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Thomas, 415 P.3d 430 (Kan. 2018). · cites it 2× “(3) Upon commitment for control, care and treatment by the Kansas department for aging and disability services pursuant to K.S.A. 59-29a07, and amendments thereto, the court shall notify the registering law enforcement agency of the county where the offender resides during…”

In Re the Care & Treatment of Foster, 127 P.3d 277 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 7× “59-29a03(a); entitles the respondent to assistance of counsel if indigent, K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 59-29a06; requires a unanimous verdict of a jury, K.”

State v. Petersen-Beard, 377 P.3d 1127 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 2× “In another area deemed to be a civil regulatory statutory scheme, the Sexually Violent Predator Act, K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 59-29a01 et seq., the legislature made a provision for the civil commitment of a qualifying person, even where that person was deemed incompetent to stand trial…”

In re Care & Treatment of Easterberg, 437 P.3d 964 (Kan. 2019). · cites it 6× “Schaefer also noted by way of comparison that, "if a person charged with a sexually violent offense has been found incompetent to stand trial, he or she can still be subjected to KSVPA proceedings, but only after 'the court shall first hear evidence and determine whether the…”

In re the Care & Treatment of Hendricks, 912 P.2d 129 (Kan. 1996). · cites it 6× “It provides for counsel to be appointed for the alleged sexually violent predator if the person is indigent, and the right to retain qualified experts or professional persons for assistance.”

In Re the Care & Treatment of Williams, 253 P.3d 327 (Kan. 2011). · cites it 4× “2d 666 (1998); see K.S.A.2010 Supp. 59-29a07(a) (stating reasonable doubt burden).”

In Re the Care & Treatment of Sykes, 367 P.3d 1244 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 4× “" K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 59-29a02(a) and K.S.A. 2014 Supp.”

Johnson v. State, 215 P.3d 575 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 2× “” K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 59-29a07(a). Because the SVPA narrows the class of persons eligible for confinement to those who find it difficult, if not impossible, to control their dangerousness, the SVPA was found to be facially constitutional by the United States Supreme Court in…”

In re the Care & Treatment of Ontiberos, 287 P.3d 855 (Kan. 2012). · cites it 3× “59-29a06(b) (right to counsel “[a]t all stages of the proceedings” and access to a qualified expert at the State’s expense); K.S.A. 59-29a07 (must prove beyond a reasonable doubt).”

In Re the Care & Treatment of Miller, 210 P.3d 625 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 59-29a07 requires that any court or jury shall determine, beyond a reasonable doubt, whether the person is a sexually violent predator and that, if such determination is made by a jury, it shall be by unanimous verdict.”

In Re the Care & Treatment of Foster, 107 P.3d 1249 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 6× “2 was drawn from K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 59-29a07. The instruction informed the jury that the purpose of the trial was to determine whether Foster was a sexually violent predator who should be civilly committed for control, care, and treatment.”

In Re the Care & Treatment of Twilleger, 263 P.3d 199 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “" K.S.A. 59-29a07(a). Once in SRS custody, a sexually violent predator is entitled to a yearly review of his or her mental condition pursuant to K.”

Show all 52 citing cases →

— K.S.A. § 59-29a07(a) — 39 cases

In Re the Care & Treatment of Foster, 127 P.3d 277 (Kan. 2006). “59-29a03(a); entitles the respondent to assistance of counsel if indigent, K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 59-29a06; requires a unanimous verdict of a jury, K.”

In Re the Care & Treatment of Williams, 253 P.3d 327 (Kan. 2011). “2d 666 (1998); see K.S.A.2010 Supp. 59-29a07(a) (stating reasonable doubt burden).”

Johnson v. State, 215 P.3d 575 (Kan. 2009). “” K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 59-29a07(a). Because the SVPA narrows the class of persons eligible for confinement to those who find it difficult, if not impossible, to control their dangerousness, the SVPA was found to be facially constitutional by the United States Supreme Court in…”

In re the Care & Treatment of Hendricks, 912 P.2d 129 (Kan. 1996). “It provides for counsel to be appointed for the alleged sexually violent predator if the person is indigent, and the right to retain qualified experts or professional persons for assistance.”

In re the Care & Treatment of Ontiberos, 287 P.3d 855 (Kan. 2012). “59-29a06(b) (right to counsel “[a]t all stages of the proceedings” and access to a qualified expert at the State’s expense); K.S.A. 59-29a07 (must prove beyond a reasonable doubt).”

— K.S.A. § 59-29a07(b) — 2 cases

In Re the Care & Treatment of Goracke, 9 P.3d 595 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).

— K.S.A. § 59-29a07(g) — 5 cases

State v. Petersen-Beard, 377 P.3d 1127 (Kan. 2016). “In another area deemed to be a civil regulatory statutory scheme, the Sexually Violent Predator Act, K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 59-29a01 et seq., the legislature made a provision for the civil commitment of a qualifying person, even where that person was deemed incompetent to stand trial…”

In re Care & Treatment of Easterberg, 437 P.3d 964 (Kan. 2019). “Schaefer also noted by way of comparison that, "if a person charged with a sexually violent offense has been found incompetent to stand trial, he or she can still be subjected to KSVPA proceedings, but only after 'the court shall first hear evidence and determine whether the…”

In Re the Care & Treatment of Sykes, 367 P.3d 1244 (Kan. 2016). “" K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 59-29a02(a) and K.S.A. 2014 Supp.”

In re the Care & Treatment of Sykes, 316 P.3d 811 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014).

State v. Schaefer (Kan. 2016).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.