Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-1611 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-1611.

History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-1611; L. 1965, ch. 355, § 7; L. 1978, ch. 231, § 31; L. 1982, ch. 152, § 10; L. 2000, ch. 171, § 80; Repealed, L. 2011, ch. 26, § 47; July 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1978–1999 · leading case: Johnson v. Johnson, 662 P.2d 1178 (Kan. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Johnson v. Johnson, 662 P.2d 1178 (Kan. 1983). · cites it 8× “K.S.A. 60-1611 reads as follows: “ ‘Effect of a decree in another state.”

Keller v. Guernsey, 608 P.2d 896 (Kan. 1980). “(See also K.S.A. 60-1611.) McKinney’s Consolidated Laws of New York; Domestic Relations Law, Sec.”

In Re the Marriage of Brown, 795 P.2d 375 (Kan. 1990). “This action was originally filed as a divorce action but became a K.S.A. 60-1611 action after a Georgia court granted appellant a divorce.”

Maddux v. Philadelphia Life Ins., 77 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (S.D. Cal. 1999). “1983); accord K.S.A. § 60-1611. A Kansas state court, therefore, would be required to give the Oklahoma divorce decree the same preclusive effect it would receive in Oklahoma.”

Kendall v. Kendall, 585 P.2d 978 (Kan. 1978). · cites it 5× “Kendall, for division of property and alimony pursuant to K.S.A. 60-1611. Keith appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.