History:
L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-268; L. 2005, ch. 101, § 9; L. 2010, ch. 135, § 142; Repealed, L. 2017, ch. 75, § 10; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Forms are for illustration purposes; the provisions of the pleading statutes control any decision concerning actual sufficiency of a pleading. James v. City of Wichita, 202 Kan. 222, 224, 447 P.2d 817.
2. Discussed; allegation that plaintiff prevented from transacting business broad enough to include loss of income. Frevele v. McAloon, 222 Kan. 295, 299, 564 P.2d 508.
Frevele v. McAloon, 564 P.2d 508 (Kan. 1977). “94, and that the Forms set out therein are declared to be sufficient in K.S.A. 60-268. We find no merit in defendants’ contention in this regard.”
Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 88 P.3d 1236 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “They are essentially appellate in nature. The purpose of a summons in the Code of Civil Procedure is to notify a defendant of a new lawsuit and the requirement that the defendant must timely file an answer or judgment will be taken.”
Matzke v. Merck & Co., 848 F. Supp. 936 (D. Kan. 1994). · cites it 2ד” *938 The court agrees with the plaintiff on both of her arguments. First, the court believes the saving statute would always begin to run with the filing of an order or journal entry of dismissal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.