Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-269 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-269.

History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-269; Repealed, L. 2005, ch. 101, § 19; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1977–1998 · leading case: Frevele v. McAloon, 564 P.2d 508 (Kan. 1977).
Frevele v. McAloon, 564 P.2d 508 (Kan. 1977). “14 of the Appendix of Forms following K.S.A. 60-269, p. 94, and that the Forms set out therein are declared to be sufficient in K.”
Marinhagen v. Boster, Inc., 840 P.2d 534 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “60-206(a) to the 10-day requirement of K.S.A. 60-269(f) gives plaintiffs until Tuesday, March 26.”
Rose & Nelson v. Frank, 956 P.2d 729 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “A defendant is put on notice of this requirement by a summons substantially similar to the summons illustrated by K.S.A. 60-269.” (Emphasis added.) 18 Kan.”
State v. Carter, 955 P.2d 119 (Kan. 1998). “60-312, and the summons forms set forth at the appendix following K.S.A. 60-269. Affidavits submitted as evidentiary proof supporting summary judgment motions obviously must be signed by the affiant.”
Midland Bank v. Rieke, 861 P.2d 129 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). “A defendant is put on notice of this requirement by a summons substantially similár to the summons illustrated by K.S.A. 60-269. While determination of whether a party has appeared in an action under K.”
K.S.A. § 60-269(f): 1 case
Marinhagen v. Boster, Inc., 840 P.2d 534 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “60-206(a) to the 10-day requirement of K.S.A. 60-269(f) gives plaintiffs until Tuesday, March 26.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.